< Geochronology
This is a view of Stevns' Cliffs (Stevns klint), Denmark in July 2005. Credit: Dan Simon.

Cenozoic geochronology is the science of applying dates in the past to apparently Cenozoic rocks.

Notations

Let

  1. ALMA represent the Asian Land Mammal Age,
  2. b2k represent before AD 2000,
  3. BP represent before present, as the chart is for 2008, this may require an added -8 for b2k,
  4. ELMMZ represent the European Land Mammal Mega Zone,
  5. FAD represent first appearance datum,
  6. GICC05 represent Greenland Ice Core Chronology 2005,
  7. GRIP represent Greenland Ice Core Project,
  8. GSSP represent Global Stratotype Section and Point,
  9. ICS represent the International Commission on Stratigraphy,
  10. IUGS represent the International Union of Geological Sciences,
  11. LAD represent last appearance datum,
  12. Ma represent Megaannum, or million years ago, or -106 b2k,
  13. NALMA represent the North American Land Mammal Age,
  14. NGRIP represent North Greenland Ice Core Project, and
  15. SALMA represent South American Land Mammal Age.

"The term b2 k [b2k] refers to the ice-core zero age of AD 2000; note that this is 50 years different from the zero yr for radiocarbon, which is AD 1950 [...]."[1]

Cenozoic time frames

Sortable table
Name (English)[2] base/start (Ma)[3] top/end (Ma)[3] status subdivision of usage named after author, year
Aftonian 0.6 0.48 age Pleistocene North America
Agenian 23 20.4 ELMMZ Miocene Europe Agen (France)
Alding(i)an 36 30 age Eocene Australia
Allerød 13,350 BP 12,700 BP chronozone Weichselian Northern Europe Allerød (Denmark)
Altonian 19.0 15.9 age Miocene New Zealand Alton
Amstelian 2.588 2.40 super-age Pleistocene Netherlands river Amstel Harmer, 1896
Anglian 0.465 0.418 age Pleistocene Great Britain East Anglia
Antian ~2.12 ~2.0 age Pleistocene Great Britain River Ant (England)
Antwerpian ± 21 ± 12 age Miocene Belgium (obsolete) Antwerp Gogels, 1879
Aquatraversian 2.588 2.4 age Pleistocene Italy
Aquitanian 23.03 20.43 age Miocene ICS Aquitaine
Archean none 2,500 eon Precambrian ICS
Arikareean 30.8 20.6 super-age Oligocene-Miocene North America
Arnold 43.0 34.3 epoch Paleogene New Zealand Arnold River
Arshantan 52.1 46.2 ALMA Eocene Asia
Astaracian 15 11.1 ELMMZ Miocene Europe The Astarac (France)
Atlantic 5,660 BP 9,220 BP chronozone Holocene Northern Europe the Atlantic Ocean Blytt, 1876
Avernian 29.2 23.03 ELMMZ Oligocene Europe
Awamoan 20.0 17.5 age Miocene New Zealand
Azoic eon Precambrian
Badenian[4] 16.3 12.8 age Miocene Paratethys Baden (Austria) Papp & Cicha, 1968
Bairnsdalian 15.0 10.5 age Miocene Australia
Balcombian 15.5 15.0 age Miocene Australia
Barstovian 16.3 13.6 age Miocene North America
Bartonian 37.2 ± 0.1 40.4 ± 0.2 age Eocene ICS Barton-on-Sea (South England) Mayer-Eymar, 1857
Batesfordian 16.5 15.5 age Miocene Australia
Bavel Interglacial 1.03 0.96 age Pleistocene Netherlands Bavel
Bavelian 1.03 0.85 super-age Pleistocene Netherlands Bavel
Baventian ~2.0 ~1.87 age Pleistocene Great Britain Easton Bavents (England) West, 1961
Beestonian 1.77 ~0.8 age Pleistocene Great Britain Beeston, Norfolk (England)
Belvédère Interglacial 0.338 0.324 age Pleistocene Netherlands quarry "Belvédère" (Maastricht)
Biber Glacial ~2.5 2.35 age Pleistocene Alps river Biber (Germany)
Biber-Donau age Pleistocene Alps
Blancan 4.9 1.8 age Pliocene-Pleistocene North America
Bolderian <21 >16 age Miocene Belgium (obsolete) Bolderberg Dumont, 1850
Bølling 13,730 BP 13,480 BP chronozone Weichselian Northern Europe Bølling Sø (Denmark)
Boreal 10,640 BP 9,220 BP chronozone Holocene Northern Europe boreal zone in ecology Blytt, 1876
Bortonian 43.0 37.0 age Eocene New Zealand Bortons
Bramertonian ~2.12 ~2.0 age Pleistocene Great Britain Bramerton Pits (England) Funnell, Norton, West and Mayhew, 1979
Bridgerian 50.3 46.2 age Eocene North America
Brüggenian 2.588 2.4 chronozone Pleistocene Northwest Europe
Brunssumian 5.3 3.6 chronozone Pliocene Northwest Europe Brunssum (The Netherlands)
Bulitian 55.8 53 age Eocene California
Bumbanian 55.7 52.1 ALMA Eocene Asia
Burdigalian 20.43 15.97 age Miocene ICS Latin: Burdigala = Bordeaux (France) Depéret, 1892
Calabrian 1.806 0.781 age Pleistocene Southern Europe Calabria
Casamajoran 54 48 age Eocene South America
Cassian 1.1 0.8 age Pleistocene Italy
Castlecliffian 1.63 0.34 age Pleistocene New Zealand Castlecliff
Cenozoic 65.5 ± 0.3 present era Phanerozoic ICS new life Phillips, 1847
Cernaysian 55.9 55.0 ELMMZ Paleocene Europe
Chadronian 38.0 33.9 age Eocene North America
Chapadmalalan 4.0 3.0 age Pliocene South America
Chasicoan 10.0 9.0 age Miocene South America
Chattian 28.4 ± 0.1 23.03 age Oligocene ICS Chatti (ancient Germanic tribe) Fuchs, 1894
Cheltenhamian 5.0 4.3 age Pliocene Australia
Clarendonian 13.6 10.3 age Miocene North America
Clarkforkian 56.8 55.4 age Paleocene-Eocene North America
Clifdenian 15.9 15.1 age Miocene New Zealand Clifden
Colhuehuapian 21.0 17.5 age Miocene South America
Colloncurian 15.5 12.0 age Miocene South America
Cromerian 0.85 0.465 super-age/age Pleistocene Netherlands, Great Britain Cromer (England)
Dacian 5.332 ± 0.005 3.600 ± 0.005 age Pliocene Paratethys Dacia (Roman province)
Danian 65.5 ± 0.3 61.7 ± 0.2 age Paleocene ICS Denmark Desor, 1847
Dannevirke 65.0 43.0 epoch Paleogene New Zealand Dannevirke
Delmontian 7.5 2.9 age Pliocene-Miocene California
Deseadan 29.0 21.0 age Oligocene-Miocene South America
Deurnian age Miocene Belgium (obsolete) Deurne de Heinzelin (1955)
Devensian 0.116 0.0115 age Pleistocene Great Britain Devenses, Celtic tribe by the Deva (England and Wales)
Divisaderan 42 36 age Eocene South America
Donau Glacial 1.7 1.35 age Pleistocene Alps river Danube
Donau-Günz >2.35 age Pleistocene Alps
Drenthian 0.238 0.17 chronozone Pleistocene Northwest Europe Drenthe
Duchesnean 42.0 38.0 age Eocene North America
Duntroonian 27.3 25.2 age Oligocene New Zealand Duntroon
Eburonian 1.80 1.45 super-age Pleistocene Netherlands Eburones, Germanic tribe
Eemian 0.130 0.116 age Pleistocene Northern Europe river Eem (Netherlands) Harting, 1875
Egerian 25.8 20.3 age Oligocene-Miocene Paratethys Eger (Hungary) Báldi & Seneš, 1968
Eggenburgian 20.8 18.3 age Miocene Paratethys Eggenburg (Austria) Steininger & Seneš, 1968
Elsterian 0.465 0.418 age Pleistocene Northern Europe river Weißen Elster (Germany)
Emilian 1.5 0.781 sub-age Pleistocene Italy
Ensenadan 1.2 0.8 SALMA Pleistocene South America
Eocene 55.8 ± 0.2 33.9 ± 0.1 epoch Paleogene ICS earliest recent Lyell, 1847
Ergilian 35.1 33.8 ALMA Oligocene-Eocene Asia
Flaminian 0.5 0.3 age Pleistocene Italy
Flandrian 0.01 present age Holocene Western Europe (obsolete) Flanders Rutot & Van den Broeck, 1885
Friasian 16.3 15.5 age Miocene South America
Fujian 11.1 9.5 age Miocene Japan
Gashatan 56.9 55.7 ALMA Paleocene-Eocene Asia
Geiseltalian 48.5 42.7 ELMMZ Eocene Europe
Gelasian 2.588 1.806 age Pleistocene ICS Gela (Italy) Rio et al., 1998
Geringian 30.8 26.3 age Oligocene North America
Gramian 10.3 8.5 age Miocene Northern Germany
Grauvian 50.8 48.5 ELMMZ Eocene Europe
Günz Glacial 2.35 age Pleistocene Alps river Günz (Germany)
Günz-Mindel age Pleistocene Alps
Hallian ~10.000 0 age Holocene California
Haranoyan 18.2 15.97 age Miocene Japan
Harrisonian 24.8 20.6 age Oligocene-Miocene North America
Hautawan 3.1 2.2 sub-age Pliocene-Pleistocene New Zealand
Haweran 0.01 present age Holocene New Zealand
Headonian 37.2 33.8 ELMMZ Oligocene-Eocene Europe
Hemingfordian 20.6 16.3 age Miocene North America
Hemmoorian age Miocene Northern Germany
Hemphillian 10.3 4.9 age Miocene-Pliocene North America
Heretaungan 49.5 46.2 age Eocene New Zealand
Holocene 11,800 BP present epoch Quaternary ICS Greek: totally new Gervais, 1867
Holsteinian 0.418 0.386 age Pleistocene Northern Europe Holstein (Germany)
Houldjinian 37.2 33.9 ALMA Asia
Houthalenian <21 >16 age Miocene Belgium (obsolete) Houthalen Hirsch, 1952
Hoxnian 0.418 0.386 age Pleistocene Great Britain Hoxne (Suffolk) West & Donner, 1956
Hsandgolian 33.8 24.0 ALMA Oligocene Asia
Huayquerian 9.0 6.8 age Miocene South America
Hutchinsonian 21 20 age Miocene New Zealand
Icenian 2.4 ~2 age Pleistocene Netherlands, England (obsolete) Iceni, ancient tribe (England) Pannekoek, 1956
Ilfordian age Pleistocene British Isles Ilford (England)
Illinoian 0.17 0.125 age Pleistocene North America
Ionian 0.781 0.126 age Pleistocene Southern Europe Ionian Sea (between Greece and Italy)
Ipswichian 0.130 0.116 age Pleistocene Great Britain Ipswich (England) West, 1957
Irdinmanhan 46.2 40.4 ALMA Eocene Asia
Irvingtonian 1.8 NALMA Pleistocene North America Irvington
Itaboraian 59 57 age Paleocene South America
Jacksonian age Eocene southern US
Janjukian 30.0 27.5 age Oligocene Australia
Johannian 48 35 age Eocene Australia
Kaburan 13.5 11.1 age Miocene Japan
Kaiatan 37.0 36.0 age Eocene New Zealand
Kalimnan 4.3 3.4 age Pliocene Australia
Kansan 0.48 0.26 age Pleistocene North America
Kapitean 6.5 5.0 age Miocene New Zealand
Karpatian 17.0 16.0 age Miocene Paratethys the Carpathian Mountains Cicha et al., 1967
Kasterlian ~4.7 ~3.6 age Pliocene Belgium (obsolete) Kasterlee Dumont, 1882
Kattendijkian ~5 ~3.6 age Pliocene Belgium (obsolete) Kattendijke Glibert & de Heinzelin, 1957
Kechienjian 1.9 1.5 age Pleistocene Japan
Kiscellian 25.8 age Oligocene Paratethys
Kryzhanovan 1.9 1.2 age Pleistocene Eastern Europe
Landenian <60 >55 age Paleocene Western Europe (obsolete) Landen (Belgium) Dumont, 1839
Landon 34.3 21.7 epoch Paleogene-Neogene New Zealand
Langenfeldian age Miocene Northern Germany
Langhian 15.97 13.65 age Miocene ICS Serravalle Langhe (Italy) Pareto, 1864
Latdorfian age Oligocene Germany
Laventan 13.8 12.0 age Miocene South America
Likhvinian 0.3 0.18 age Pleistocene Eastern Europe
Lillburnian 15.1 12.7 age Miocene New Zealand
Lishihhuangtuan 1.2 0.1 age Pleistocene China
Longfordian 27.5 16.5 age Oligocene-Miocene Australia
Ludhamian ~2.52 ~2.25 age Pleistocene Great Britain Ludham (England)
Ludian age Eocene western Europe de Lapparent, 1893
Luisian 15.5 13.5 age Miocene California
Lujanian 0.8 0.3 age Pleistocene South America
Lutetian 48.6 ± 0.2 40.4 ± 0.2 age Eocene ICS Latin: Lutetia=Paris (France) de Lapparent, 1883
Malanghuangtuan 0.1 0.01 age Pleistocene China
Mangaorapan 53.0 49.5 age Eocene New Zealand
Mangapanian 3.00 2.40 age Pliocene-Pleistocene New Zealand
Marahuan 2.2 1.8 sub-age Pleistocene New Zealand
Mayoian 12.0 10.0 age Miocene South America
Menapian 1.03 super-age Pleistocene Netherlands Menapii, Germanic tribe
Merksemian ~2.5 ~2 age Pleistocene Belgium (obsolete) Merksem de Heinzelin, 1958
Mesozoic 251.0 ± 0.7 65.5 ± 0.3 era ICS middle life
Messinian 7.246 5.332 age Miocene ICS Messina (Italy) Mayer-Eymar, 1867
Mindel 0.85 0.465 age Pleistocene Alps river Mindel (Germany)
Mindel-Riss 0.465 0.238 age Pleistocene Alps
Miocene 23.03 5.332 epoch Neogene ICS Greek: less recent Lyell, 1847
Mitchellian 10.5 5.0 age Pliocene-Miocene Australia
Mohnian 13.5 7.5 age Miocene California
Monroecreekian 26.3 24.8 age Oligocene North America Monroe Creek
Montehermosan 6.8 4.0 age Pliocene-Miocene South America
Montian ~65 ~61 age Paleocene Europe (obsolete) Mons (Belgium) Dewalque, 1868
Morozovan 0.8 0.5 age Pleistocene Eastern Europe
Mustersan 48 42 age Eocene South America
Nanzian 48 35 age Eocene California
Nebraskan 0.93 0.6 age Pleistocene North America (obsolete)
Needian 0.42 0.38 age Pleistocene Netherlands (obsolete) Neede
Neocomian 145.5 125.0/130.0 epoch obsolete Neocomium, Latin name for Neuchâtel
Neogene 23.0 2.588 period Cenozoic ICS Hoernes, 1856
Neporatan 2.5 1.7 age Pleistocene Eastern Europe
Neustrian 55.0 50.8 ELMMZ Paleocene-Eocene Europe
Nomentanan 0.24 0.13 age Pleistocene Italy
Nongshanian 62.9 56.9 ALMA Paleocene Asia
Nukumaruan 3.1 1.8 age Pleistocene New Zealand
Odessan 1.2 0.8 age Pleistocene Eastern Europe
Okehuan 1.1 0.37 age Pleistocene New Zealand
Older Dryas 13,480 BP 13,350 BP chron Weichselian Europe Dryas octopetala (plant)
Oldest Dryas 13,860 13,780 chron Weichselian Europe Dryas octopetala (plant)
Oligocene 33.9 ± 0.1 23.03 epoch Paleogene ICS "not so recent" Beyrich, 1857
Oostermeer Interglacial 0.243 0.238 age Pleistocene Netherlands Oostermeer
Opoitian 5.0 3.8 age Pliocene New Zealand
Orellan 33.9 33.3 age Oligocene North America
Orleanian 20.4 15 ELMMZ Miocene Europe Orléans (France)
Otaian 21.7 19.0 age Miocene New Zealand
Ottnangian 18.3 17.0 age Miocene Paratethys Ottnang am Hausruck (Austria) Papp & Rögl, 1967
Paleocene 65.5 ± 0.3 55.8 ± 0.2 epoch Paleogene ICS oldest recent Schimper, 1847
Paleophytic ~450 ~270 era paleobotany old flora
Paleogene 65.5 ± 0.3 23.0 period Cenozoic ICS Hoernes, 1856
Paleozoic 542.0 ± 1.0 251.0 ± 0.7 era Phanerozoic ICS old life
Pannonian 11.608 ± 0.005 7.246 ± 0.005 age Miocene Paratethys Pannonia (Roman province) Roth von Telegd, 1879
Pareora 21.7 15.9 epoch Neogene New Zealand
Pastonian ~1.87 1.77 age Pleistocene Great Britain Paston, Norfolk (England)
Peligran 62.5 59 age Paleocene South America
Penutian 53 51 age Eocene California
Phanerozoic 542.0 ± 1.0 present eon ICS visible life
Piacenzian 3.600 2.588 age Pliocene ICS Piacenza (Italy) Mayer-Eymar, 1858
Pleistocene 2.588 0.0117 epoch Quaternary ICS youngest recent
Pleniglacial 73,000 BP 14,500 BP sub-age Pleistocene Northern Europe
Pliocene 5.332 2.588 epoch Neogene ICS newer recent Lyell, 1847
Poederlian ~3.5 ~2.5 age Pliocene Belgium (obsolete) Poederlee Vincent, 1889
Pontian 7.246 ± 0.005 5.332 ± 0.005 epoch Miocene Paratethys Pontus Euxinus, Latin name for the Black Sea Le Play, 1842
Pontinian 0.1 0.01 age Pleistocene Italy
Porangan 46.2 43.0 age Eocene New Zealand
Preboreal 11,560 BP 10,640 BP chron Northern Europe before the Boreal
Precambrian none 542.0 ± 1.0 none (before: eon) worldwide before the Cambrian
Pre-Illinoian age Pleistocene North America before the Illinoian
Preludhamian ~2.52 ~2.61 age Pliocene-Pleistocene Great Britain before the Ludhamian
Prepastonian ~2.0 ~1.87 age Pleistocene Great Britain before the Pastonian
Pretiglian 2.588 2.40 super-age Pleistocene Netherlands before the Tiglian Tegelen (The Netherlands) Van der Vlerk, 1948
Priabonian 37.2 ± 0.1 33.9 ± 0.1 age Eocene ICS Priabona (Italy) Munier-Chalmas & De Lapparent, 1893
Proterozoic 2,500 542.0 ± 1.0 eon ICS
Puercan 65.5 63.3 age Paleocene-Cretaceous North America
Putikian 0.37 0.01 age Pleistocene New Zealand
Quaternary 2.588 present period Cenozoic ICS fourth part Arduino, 1760
Rancholabrean NALMA Pleistocene North America
Refugian 35.0 33.5 age Oligocene-Eocene California
Reinbekian age Miocene Northern Germany
Relizian 16.5 13.5 age Miocene California
Repettian 2.9 2.2 age Pliocene-Pleistocene California
Reuverian 3.5 2.558 chronozone Pliocene Northwest Europe Reuver (The Netherlands)
Riochican 57 54 age Eocene-Paleocene South America
Riss Glacial 0.238 0.128 age Pleistocene Alps river Riß (Germany)
Riss-Würm Interglacial 0.128 0.116 age Pleistocene Alps
Robiacian 42.7 37.2 ELMMZ Miocene Europe
Romanian 3.6 1.8 age Pliocene-Pleistocene Paratethys
Runangan 36.0 34.3 age Eocene-Oligocene New Zealand
Rupelian 33.9 ± 0.1 28.4 ± 0.1 age Oligocene ICS river Rupel (Belgium) Dumont, 1850
Ruscinian 4.9 3.5 ELMMZ Pliocene Europe Ruscino, Latin for the Roussillon (France) Kretzoi, 1962
Saalian 0.238 0.128 age Pleistocene Northern Europe river Saale (Germany)
Sangamonian 0.125 0.075 age Pleistocene North America
Santacrucian 17.5 16.3 age Miocene South America
Santomian 1.81 1.5 sub-age Pleistocene Italy
Sarmatian 12.7 11.6 age Miocene Paratethys Sarmatians (ancient people) Suess, 1866
Saucesian 22.0 16.5 age Miocene California
Scaldisian ~4 ~2.5 age Pliocene Belgium (obsolete) Scaldus, Latin name for the river Scheldt Dumont, 1850
Scythian 251 ± 0.2 245 ± 1.5 Epoch Early Triassic Europe Scythia
Selandian 61.7 ± 0.2 58.7 ± 0.2 age Paleocene ICS Seeland (Denmark) Rosenkrantz, 1924
Serravallian 13.65 11.608 age Miocene ICS Serravalle Scrivia (Italy) Pareto, 1864
Shanghuan 65.5 62.9 ALMA Paleocene Asia
Sharamurunian 40.4 37.2 ALMA Eocene Asia
Sicilian 0.781 0.260 sub-age Pleistocene Italy Sicily
Southland 15.9 10.9 epoch Neogene New Zealand
Stampian age Oligocene western Europe Étampes (France) d'Orbigny, 1852
Subatlantic 2400 BP 0 chron Holocene Northern Europe
Subboreal 5660 BP 2400 BP chron Holocene Northern Europe
Suchian 3.0 1.9 age Pliocene-Pleistocene Japan
Suevian 33.8 29.2 ELMMZ Oligocene Europe
Susterian 8.5 5.3 chronozone Miocene Northwest Europe Susteren (The Netherlands)
Syltian age Miocene Northern Germany
Tabenbulakian 24.0 23.03 ALMA Oligocene Asia
Taranaki 10.9 5.28 epoch Neogene New Zealand
Tarantian 0.15 0.0115 age Pleistocene Southern Europe Tarento (Italy)
Taxandrian 1.80 0.418 super-age Pleistocene Netherlands (obsolete)
Tertiary 65.5 ± 0.3 2.588 sub-era Cenozoic[5] worldwide third part Arduino, 1760
Teurian 65.0 55.5 age Paleocene New Zealand
Thanetian 58.7 ± 0.2 55.8 ± 0.2 age Paleocene ICS Isle of Thanet (England) Renevier, 1874
Thurnian ~2.25 ~2.12 age Pleistocene Great Britain River Thurne (England} West, 1961
Tiffanian 60.2 56.8 age Paleocene North America
Tiglian 2.40 1.80 super-age Pleistocene Netherlands Tegelen (The Netherlands)
Tinguirirican 36 29 age Oligocene-Eocene South America
Tiupampan 64.5 62.5 age Paleocene South America Tiupampa Marshall & de Muizon, 1988
Tongaporutuan 10.9 6.5 age Miocene New Zealand
Tongrian age Oligocene western Europe
Torrejonian 63.3 60.2 age Paleocene North America
Tortonian 11.608 7.246 age Miocene ICS Tortona (Italy) Mayer-Eymar, 1858
Totomian 3.6 3.0 age Pliocene Japan
Tozawan 15.97 13.5 age Miocene Japan
Treenean 0.15 0.17 chronozone Pleistocene Northwest Europe
Tubantian 0.116 0.0115 age Pleistocene Netherlands (obsolete) Van der Vlerk & Florschütz, 1950
Turolian 8.7 4.9 ELMMZ Miocene-Pliocene Europe Turolium, Latin for Teruel (Spain) Crusafont, 1965
Tyrrhenian 0.26 0.01143 sub-age Pleistocene Italy Tyrrhenian Sea Issel, 1914
Uintan 46.2 42.0 age Eocene North America
Ulangochuian 37.2 35.1 ALMA Eocene Asia
Ulatisian 51 48 age Eocene California
Uquian 3.0 1.2 age Pliocene-Pleistocene South America Uquia (Argentina) Castellanos, 1923
Vallesian 11.1 8.7 ELMMZ Miocene Europe The Vallès (Spain) Crusafont, 1950
Venturian 2.2 1.9 age Pleistocene California
Vierlandian age Miocene Northern Germany
Vicksburgian age Oligocene southern US
Villafranchian 3.5 1.1 ELMMZ Pliocene-Pleistocene Europe
Waalian 1.45 1.20 super-age Pleistocene Netherlands Waal
Waiauan 12.7 10.9 age Miocene New Zealand
Waipawan 55.5 53.0 age Eocene New Zealand
Waipipian 3.60 3.00 age Pliocene New Zealand
Waitakian 25.2 21.7 age Oligocene-Miocene New Zealand
Waitotaran 3.8 3.1 sub-age Pliocene New Zealand
Waltonian ~2.52 age Pliocene Great Britain Walton-on-the-Naze Harmer,
Wanganui 5.28 present epoch Neogene-Quaternary New Zealand Wanganui
Wangerripian age Paleocene-Eocene Australia
Warthian 0.15 0.13 chronozone Pleistocene Northwest Europe
Wasatchian 55.4 50.3 age Eocene North America
Weichselian 0.116 0.0115 age Northern Europe Weichsel, German name for the river Vistula (Poland)
Werrikooian 1.00 1.806 age Pleistocene Australia
Whaingaroan 34.3 27.3 age Oligocene New Zealand
Wheelerian 1.9 0.01143 age Pleistocene California
Whitneyan 33.3 30.8 age Oligocene North America
Wisconsinan 0.075 0.01 age Pleistocene North America
Wolstonian 0.238 0.128 age Pleistocene Great Britain Wolston (England)
Wuchenghuangtuan 2.4 1.2 age Pleistocene China
Würm Glacial 0.116 0.0115 age Pleistocene Alps river Würm (Germany)
Yarmouthian 0.26 0.17 age Pleistocene North America Aegean Sea
Yatalan 3.4 2.0 age Pliocene-Pleistocene Australia
Younger Dryas 12,700 BP 11,560 BP chron Weichselian Northern Europe Dryas octopetala (plant)
Ypresian 55.8 ± 0.2 48.6 ± 0.2 age Eocene ICS Ypres, French name for
Ieper (Ieper) in Belgium
Dumont, 1849
Ynezian 61.5 55.8 age Paleocene California
Yuian 9.5 3.6 age Pliocene-Miocene Japan
Yuzanjian 1.5 0.75 age Pleistocene Japan
Zanclean 5.332 3.60 age Pliocene ICS Zancla, old name for Messina (Italy) Sequenza, 1868
Zemorrian 33.5 22.0 age Oligocene-Miocene California

Cenozoic

Cretaceous-Paleogene clay is in the Geulhemmergroeve tunnels near Geulhem, The Netherlands. Credit: Wilson44691.
In the Badlands near Drumheller, Alberta, erosion has exposed the K-Pg boundary. Credit: Glenlarson.
The KT boundary at Trinidad Lake State Park, Colorado, USA, is at the color change. Credit: Nationalparks.

In the image on the right, the finger is pointing to the K/Pg boundary clay in the Geulhemmergroeve tunnels near Geulhem, The Netherlands.

The second from the top image on the right shows the K-Pg boundary in the Badlands near Drumheller, Alberta, where glacial and post-glacial erosion have exposed the boundary.

The cliffs at Stevns, in the image at the top of this page, have the highest iridium occurrence in the Alvarez analysis.

The K-Pg boundary at Trinidad Lake State Park, Colorado, USA, in the fourth image on the right, occurs at the color change from dark gray or black to the Cenozoic light tans and browns.

"Our assessment of published radiometric dates suggests the following best biochronologic age estimates for Cenozoic Epoch boundaries: Pliocene/Pleistocene: <2 Ma; Miocene/Pliocene: ~5 Ma; Oligocene/Miocene: ~23.5 Ma; Eocene/Oligocene: ~37 Ma; Paleocene/Eocene: ~56.5 Ma; Cretaceous/Tertiary: ~66 Ma. The radiometric data on which these age estimates are based, especially in the Paleogene, are biased toward those obtained from high-temperature minerals; age estimates based on radiometric dates from glauconites tend to be younger, particularly in the Paleogene (for example, Odin and others, 1982)."[6]

Quaternary

Calculated Greenland temperatures are through the last 20,000 years. Credit: Willi Dansgaard.

The "whole change elapsed just opposite the course of events that characterized the great glacial oscillations with sudden warming followed by slow cooling. Therefore, the two phenomena hardly have the same cause."[7]

"In the Greenland ice cores, the Pleistocene–Holocene transition is chronologically constrained between two clearly defined tephra horizons: the Saksunarvatn tephra (1409.83 m depth) and the Vedde Ash (1506.14 m depth). These are dated at 10 347 yr b2 k (counting uncertainty 89 yr) and 12 171 yr (counting uncertainty 114 yr) b2 k, respectively."[1]

Holocene

The base of the Holocene Series/Epoch is defined in the NGRIP ice-core record at the horizon which shows the clearest signal of climatic warming, an event that marks the end of the last cold episode (Younger Dryas Stadial/Greenland Stadial 1) of the Pleistocene. Credit: Mike Walker, Sigfus Johnsen, Sune Olander Rasmussen, Trevor Popp, Jørgen-Peder Steffensen, Phil Gibbard, Wim Hoek, John Lowe, John Andrews, Svante Björck, Les C. Cwynar, Konrad Hughen, Peter Kershaw, Bernd Kromer, Thomas Litt, David J. Lowe, Takeshi Nakagawa, Rewi Newnham and Jakob Schwander.

The Holocene starts at ~11,700 b2k and extends to the present.

"A timescale based on multi-parameter annual layer counting provides an age of 11 700 calendar yr b2k (before AD 2000) for the base of the Holocene, with a maximum counting error of 99 yr."[1]

"The base of the Holocene Series/Epoch is defined in the NGRIP ice-core record [above] at the horizon which shows the clearest signal of climatic warming, an event that marks the end of the last cold episode (Younger Dryas Stadial/Greenland Stadial 1) of the Pleistocene [...]."[1]

19th Century

Napoleon I on his Imperial Throne is portrayed by Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres (French, 1806), oil on canvas. Credit: Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres.
A Navajo blanket was made circa 1880. Credit: Unknown Navajo weaver, pre-1889.

The painting Napoleon I on his Imperial Throne dates to 1806 by artist Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres.

"This blanket [in the image centered] was woven at the end of the "wearing blanket era," just as the railroad came into the Southwest in 1881. The heavier handspun yarns and synthetic dyes are typical of pieces made during the transition from blanket weaving to rug weaving."-Ann Hedlund, Arizona State Museum.

Charred material from the Lake Pátzcuaro Basin, Mexico, was radiocarbon dated at 1715-1895 AD (120 b2k intercept).[8]

18th Century

The more recent dated logboat of Ireland is from or known as Bond's Bridge, Cos AmlaghJTyrone, to 245 ± 15 b2k.[9]

17th Century

A logboat from Northern Ireland designated GrN-14744 dates to 305 ± 30 b2k.[9]

16th Century

LiDAR gave the power to see underneath the lava that covers Angamuco. Credit: Chris Fisher.{{fairuse}}

A logboat from Ireland (Derryloughan B, Co. Tyrone) designated GrN-14738 dates to 410 ± 35 b2k.[9]

Angamuco "occupied 26 square kilometers of land instead of 13 square kilometers."[10]

"That is a huge area with a lot of people and a lot of architectural foundations that are represented."[11]

"If you do the maths, all of a sudden you are talking about 40,000 building foundations up there, which is [about] the same number of building foundations that are on the island of Manhattan."[11]

Angamuco "had an unusual layout, with big structures like pyramids and open plazas situated around the edges rather than in the center."[10]

"The Purépecha people existed at the same time as the Aztecs. While they are nowhere near as popular as their rivals, they were still a major civilization and had an imperial capital called Tzintzuntzan in western Mexico. Based on [...] LiDAR scans, though, Angamuco is even bigger Tzintzuntzan. It likely wasn't as densely populated, but [...] it's now the biggest city in western Mexico during that period that we know of."[10]

"In I523 Cortes quietly appropriated for himself the great Tarascan-held silver district of Tamazula (Jalisco)."[12]

Late Middle Ages

Changes in the 14C record, which are primarily (but not exclusively) caused by changes in solar activity, are graphed over time. Credit: Leland McInnes.
The Shroud of Turin: modern photo of the face, is shown positive left, digitally processed image right. Credit: Dianelos Georgoudis.

The Late Middle Ages extends from about 700 b2k to 500 b2k.

Italian humanism began in the first century of the late Middle Ages (c.1350-1450).[13]

The processed image at the right in the images on the right is the product of the application of digital filters. Digital filters are mathematical functions that do not add any information to the image, but transform it in such a way that information already present in it becomes more visible or easier to appreciate by the naked eye. The processed image was produced by inverting the brightness of the pixels in the positive image but without inverting their hue, and then by increasing both the brightness contrast and the hue saturation. Finally noise and so-called “salt and pepper” filters automatically removed the noisy information from the original image which hinders the appreciation of the actual face. To my knowledge the resulting image is the best available and indeed the only one that reveals the color information hidden in the original.

Radiocarbon dating of a corner piece of the shroud placed it between the years 1260 and 1390,[14] in the High to Late Middle Ages, which is consistent with "its first recorded exhibition in France in 1357."[15]

"Italy from the peace of Lodi to the first French invasion (1454-94): the era of equilibrium"[13] is near the end of the late Middle Ages.

Charred materials from the Lake Pátzcuaro Basin, Mexico, were radiocarbon dated at 1170-1300 AD (680 b2k intercept), 1230-1315 AD (665 b2k intercept), 1300-1415 AD (605 b2k intercept), 1320-1535 AD (540 b2k intercept) and 1320-1435 AD (500 b2k intercept).[8]

The Little Ice Age (LIA) appears to have lasted from about 1218 (782 b2k) to about 1878 (122 b2k).

High Middle Ages

The map shows the geographical distribution of the archaeological sites sampled. Credit: Nicole Maca-Meyer, Matilda Arnay, Juan Carlos Rando, Carlos Flores, Ana M González, Vicente M Cabrera, José M Larruga.

The High Middle Ages date from around 1,000 b2k to 700 b2k.

Mitochondrial "DNA analysis (HVRI sequences and RFLPs) [have been performed from] aborigine remains around 1000 years old. The sequences retrieved show that the Guanches possessed U6b1 lineages that are in the present day Canarian population, but not in Africans. In turn, U6b, the phylogenetically closest ancestor found in Africa, is not present in the Canary Islands. Comparisons with other populations relate the Guanches with the actual inhabitants of the Archipelago and with Moroccan Berbers. This shows that, despite the continuous changes suffered by the population (Spanish colonisation, slave trade), aboriginal mtDNA lineages constitute a considerable proportion of the Canarian gene pool. Although the Berbers are the most probable ancestors of the Guanches, it is deduced that important human movements have reshaped Northwest Africa after the migratory wave to the Canary Islands."[16]

The "sublineage U6b1 is the most prevalent of the U6 subhaplogroup in the Canarian population,4 and has still not been detected in North Africa."[16]

"This survey includes 131 teeth, corresponding to 129 different individuals, belonging to 15 archaeological sites sampled from four of the seven Canary Islands and dated around 1000 years old [image on the right]."[16]

"The Canarian-specific U6b1 sequences are also found in high frequency (8.45%), corroborating the fact that these lineages were already present in the aboriginal population. Three additional founder haplotypes4 were also detected (260, 069 126 and 126 292 294), all of them showing equal or higher frequencies than in the present day Canarian population."[16]

"The detection in the Guanches of the most abundant haplotype of the U6b1 branch, also found in present day islanders,4 points to a significant continuity of the aboriginal maternal gene pool."[16]

"The [...] estimated age of the [U6b1] subgroup is around 6000 years,29 which predates the arrival of the first human settlers to the Islands.1"[16]

Charred materials from the Lake Pátzcuaro Basin, Mexico, were radiocarbon dated at 970-1,170 AD (885 b2k intercept) and 1,010-1275 AD (775 b2k intercept).[8]

Medieval Warm Period

Northern hemisphere temperature reconstructions are for the past 2,000 years. Credit: Global Warming Art.
The figure shows the number of samples in time for the Central European oak chronology. Credit: Stand.
The center of the graph shows the time axis of conventionally dated historical events. Upper and lower coordinates show reconstructed time tables. The black triangles mark the phantom years. Credit: Hans-Ulrich Niemitz.

The Medieval Warm Period (MWP) dates from around 1150 to 750 b2k.

"A proof-of-concept self-calibrating chronology [based upon the Irish Oak chronology] clearly demonstrates that third order polynomials provide a series of statistical calibration curves that highlight lacunae in the samples."[17]

As indicated in the figures, the data used in the plots comes from radiocarbon dating of Irish Oaks.[18]

Gaps occur near the 1070s and 1470s b2k during the rising Δ14C values.

"The number of suitable samples of wood, which connect Antiquity and the Middle Ages is very small [shown in the second figure on the left]. But only a great number of samples would give certainty against error. For the period about 380 AD we have only 3, for the period about 720 AD only 4 suitable samples of wood (Hollstein 1980,11); usually 50 samples serve for dating."[19]

"The center of the graph [in the third image on the left] shows the time axis of conventionally dated historical events. Upper and lower coordinates show reconstructed time tables. The black triangles mark the phantom years."[19]

"In Frankfurt am Main archaeological excavations did not find any layer for the period between 650 and 910 AD."[19]

Early Middle Ages

Third order polynomials provide a series of statistical calibration curves that highlight lacunae in the carbon-14 samples. Credit: Gunnar Heinsohn.
The Δ14C values in a chronology can clearly be used to identify apparent catastrophic gaps and catastrophic rises in carbon-14. Credit: Gunnar Heinsohn.

The Early Middle Ages date from around 1,700 to 1,000 b2k.

At left is an attempt to correlate the change in 14C with time before 1950. The different data sets are shown with different colored third order polynomial fits to each data set.

"The Δ14C values in a chronology can clearly be used to identify catastrophic gaps and catastrophic rises in carbon-14."[20]

The first four gaps have a jump up in 14C with a fairly quick return to the calibration curve shown in the figure on the second left. However, from about 2000 b2k there is a steady rise in the Δ14C values.

Imperial Antiquity

In Felix Romuliana, "the construction [...] is [...] Imperial Antique (1st-3rd c. [1900-1700 b2k]), and sometimes even late Hellenistic, [in] appearance."[20]

Subatlantic period

The archaeological site of Tzintzuntzan is the capital of the Tarascan state. Credit: Hajor.{{free media}}

The "calibration of radiocarbon dates at approximately 2500-2450 BP [2500-2450 b2k] is problematic due to a "plateau" (known as the "Hallstatt-plateau") in the calibration curve [...] A decrease in solar activity caused an increase in production of 14C, and thus a sharp rise in Δ 14C, beginning at approximately 850 cal (calendar years) BC [...] Between approximately 760 and 420 cal BC (corresponding to 2500-2425 BP [2500-2425 b2k]), the concentration of 14C returned to "normal" values."[21]

"The main discontinuity in the climatic condition during the Bronze Age and Iron Age transition can be identified in the boundary from Subatlantic to Subboreal (2800-2500 BP; 996/914-766/551 2σ cal. BC). Such period “has globally been identified as a time of marked climatic change. Stratigraphical, paleobotanical and archaeological evidence point to a change from a dry and warm to a more humid and cool climate in central and northwestern Europe” (Tinner et al. 2003). The climatic deterioration which characterizes this chronological range is directly responsible of the plateau in the calibration curve between 760 and 420 BC (2500-2425 BP) (see chapter 4.3.2.1). The climatic oscillation around 2700 BP (896/813 2σ cal. BC) has been detected worldwide. Van Geel et al. (1996, 1998) and Speranza et al. (2002) found an abrupt shift around 850 BC in changing species composition of peat-forming mosses in European Holocene raised bog deposits. The change was from mosses preferring warm conditions to those preferring colder and wetter environments. Archaeological evidence supports such a change. Bronze Age settlements located in the Netherlands were suddenly abandoned after a long period of occupation which last around one millennium (Dergachev et al. 2004). Other studies confirmed the climatic discontinuity; Schilman et al. (2001) studied δ18O and δ13C in deposits from the southeastern Mediterranean, off Israel, and recognized the presence of two humid events in the time ranges of 3500-3000 BP (1884/1772-1263/1215 2σ cal. BC) and 1700-1000 BP (332/389-1016/1030 2σ cal. AD) and a period of arid conditions between 3000 and 1700 BP (1263/1215 2σ cal. BC- 332/389 2σ cal. AD). Barber and Langdon (2001) identified three main long climatic deteriorations 2900-2830 BP (1119/1037-1012/934 2σ cal. BC), 2630-2590 BP (810/797-801/788 2σ cal. BC) and 1550-1400 BP (430/549-637/658 2σ cal. AD) through the analysis of plant macrofossils in a peat deposit of Walton Moss located in Northern England and comparing such data with a temperature reconstruction based on chironomids in the sediment of a nearby lake."[22]

"Hallstatt disaster"

"Hallstatt disaster" refers to the plateau located in the calibration curve between 760 and 420 cal BC (2500-2425 BP). Credit: Giacomo Capuzzo.{{fairuse}}

"With the term “Hallstatt disaster” the scientific community refers to the plateau located in the calibration curve between 760 and 420 cal BC (2500-2425 BP) [the graph on the right]. The term is due to the chronological analogy to the Hallstatt society which developed in the late Bronze Age and the beginning of Iron Age in the northern part of the Alps (Austria). The flat shape of the calibration curve in this time-span is the result of the decrease, and hence the return to normal values, of the percentage of 14C after a period characterized by an increase in the concentration of radiocarbon in the atmosphere, which is mirrored in the calibration curve as a sharp descent between 850 and 760 BC (2700-2450 BP) (Speranza et al. 2000). As asserted by many authors (Van Geel et al. 1996; Van Geel et al. 1998; Tinner et al. 2003; Dergachev et al. 2004; Van der Plicht et al. 2004; Swindles et al. 2007) the chronological range 850-760 BC is characterized by an abrupt increase of the amount of 14C in the atmosphere and it corresponds chronologically to the boundary from Subatlantic to Subboreal (2800-2500 BP), which “has globally been identified as a time of marked climatic change. Stratigraphical, paleobotanical and archaeological evidence point to a change from a dry and warm to a more humid and cool climate in central and northwestern Europe” (Tinner et al. 2003)."[22]

Subboreal period

The "period around 850-760 BC, [2850-2760 b2k, is] characterised by a decrease in solar activity and a sharp increase of Δ 14C [...] the local vegetation succession, in relation to the changes in atmospheric radiocarbon content, shows additional evidence for solar forcing of climate change at the Subboreal - Subatlantic transition."[21]

The "Holocene climatic optimum in this interior part of Asia [Lake Baikal] corresponds to the Subboreal period 2.5–4.5 ka".[23]

The "apparent reality of social equality testified by LBA urnfield burials can be definitely discarded at the Iron Age transition by the archaeological excavation at the Hexenbergle site, near Wehringen in Bayern (Germany). The monumental radiocarbon dated mound with a cremation burial of an adult male accompanied by a great amount of objects, including a sword, elements decorating a wagon and an extensive set of painted pottery (Hennig 1995). The dendrochronological date obtained on the wagon (778±5BC) provides a precise temporal location for an upper-class deceased with sepulchral paraphernalia in the Hallstatt period (Friedrich & Henning 1995, 1996)."[22]

Iron Age

Photographs of three of the originally nine iron beads from Gerzeh, Lower Egypt, from left UC10738, UC10739 and UC10740. Credit: Thilo Rehren, Tamás Belgya, Albert Jambon, György Káli, Zsolt Kasztovszky, Zoltán Kis, Imre Kovács, Boglárka Maróti, Marcos Martinón-Torres, Gianluca Miniaci, Vincent C. Pigott, Miljana Radivojević, László Rosta, László Szentmiklósi, Zoltán Szőkefalvi-Nagy.
Comparison of neutron radiography and an optical photograph of an iron bead is shown. Credit: Thilo Rehren, Tamás Belgya, Albert Jambon, György Káli, Zsolt Kasztovszky, Zoltán Kis, Imre Kovács, Boglárka Maróti, Marcos Martinón-Torres, Gianluca Miniaci, Vincent C. Pigott, Miljana Radivojević, László Rosta, László Szentmiklósi, Zoltán Szőkefalvi-Nagy.

The iron age history period began between 3,200 and 2,100 b2k.

"The earliest known iron artefacts are nine small beads securely dated to circa 3200 BC, from two burials in Gerzeh, northern Egypt."[24]

"Since both tombs are securely dated to Naqada IIC–IIIA, c 3400–3100 BC (Adams, 1990: 25; Stevenson, 2009: 11–31), the beads predate the emergence of iron smelting by nearly 2000 years, and other known meteoritic iron artefacts by 500 years or more (Yalçın 1999), giving them an exceptional position in the history of metal use."[24]

The image on the left uses neutron radiography to show the metal underneath the corrosion.

"Bead UC10738 [in the image on the right] has a maximum length of 1.5 cm and a maximum diameter of 1.3 cm, bead UC10739 is 1.7 cm by 0.7 cm, and bead UC10740 is 1.7 cm by 0.3 cm. All three beads are of rust-brown colour with a rough surface, indicative of heavy iron corrosion. Initial analysis by [proton–induced X–ray fluorescence] pXRF indicated an elevated nickel content of the surface of the beads, in the order of a few per cent, and their magnetic property suggested that iron metal may be present in their body (Jambon, 2010)."[24]

The earliest-known iron artifacts are nine small beads dated to 3200 BC, which were found in burials at Gerzeh, Lower Egypt. They have been identified as meteoric iron shaped by careful hammering.[25] Meteoric iron, a characteristic iron–nickel alloy, was used by various ancient peoples thousands of years before the Iron Age. Such iron, being in its native metallic state, required no smelting of ores.[26][27]

"After a typological analysis and a cross-dating of bronze artifacts recovered north and south of the Alps, the Roman school of Peroni set the 1020 [3020 b2k] as the beginning of the Iron Age (De Marinis 2005, p. 21; Pacciarelli 2005). The date is in agreement with the chronology supported by Lothar Sperber (Sperber 1987). The recent works of Nijboer based on the analysis of radiocarbon dates from Latial contexts agree with this high chronology (Nijboer et al. 1999-2000; Nijboer & Van der Plicht 2008; Van der Plicht et al. 2009)."[22]

Bronze Age

A general world-wide use of bronze occurred between 5300 and 2600 b2k.

"The first (purely typological) studies on Early Bronze Age (EBA) assemblages in the Jordan Valley settled on the turn of the 4th/3rd millennium BC [mark] the beginnings of the earliest Bronze Age culture (Albright 1932; Mallon 1932)."[28]

"In the Chalcolithic/earliest Bronze Age I period (c. 4500±3000 cal BC), copper was mined in open galleries from the massive brown sandstone deposit, which consisted of thick layers of the copper carbonate malachite and chalcocite, a copper sulphide."[29]

Late Bronze Ages

The Late Bronze Ages begin about 3550 b2k and end about 2900 b2k.

The Pátzcuaro Basin is "on the Central Mexican Altiplano [19° 36′ N 101° 39′ W 2,033–3,000 meters above sea level (m asl)] [...] The earliest occupation is indicated by maize pollen in lake cores [sometime between 1690 and 940 B.C. (43, 47, 49)]."[8]

The "abandonment of lakeshore Swiss pile-dwellings has been dated to around 1520 BC [3520 b2k] (Menotti 2001). [Slightly] "later in time episodes of flood events and lake-level highstand at 3100 BP (1415/1311 2σ cal. BC) and 2800 BP (996/914 2σ cal. BC) have been recently detected in the Southern Alps, in the sediment cores extracted from the Lake Ledro, located in the province of Trento (Joannin et al. 2014)."[22]

Radiocarbon "data indicate that the New Kingdom of Egypt started between 1570 and 1544 B.C.E [3570 - 3544 b2k]."[30]

Middle Bronze Ages

Fresco of The Fisherman is from Akrotiri, Santorini, Greece at a height of 1.10 m. Credit: Yann Forget.{{free media}}

The Middle Bronze Ages begin about 4100 b2k and end about 3550 b2k.

The Fisherman is a Minoan Bronze Age fresco from Akrotiri, on the Aegean island of Santorini (classically Thera), dated to the Neo-Palatial period (c. 1640–1600 BC). The settlement of Akrotiri was buried in volcanic ash (dated by radiocarbon dating to c. 1627 BC [c. 3626 b2k]) by the Minoan eruption on the island, which preserved many Minoan frescoes like this.

High precision radiocarbon dating of 18 samples from Jericho, including six samples of carbonized cereal from the burnt stratum, gave the age of the strata as 1562 BC, with a margin of error of 38 years [3562 ± 38 b2k].[31]

Early Bronze Ages

The Early Bronze Ages begin about 5300 b2k and end about 4100 b2k. A logboat from Ireland (Inch Abbey, Co. Down) was dendrochronology dated to 4140 b2k.[9]

A logboat made from alder from Denmark (Verup l) designated K-4098B was radiocarbon dated to 4220 ± 75 b2k.[9]

A logboat from Ireland (Ballygowan, Co. AmJagh) designated GrN-20550 was radiocarbon dated to 4660 ± 40 b2k.[9]

Atlantic

Hieroglyphics found at El-Khawy in Egypt show two storks, back to back, with an ibis between them (left), as well as a bull's head (right). Credit: John Darnell, Yale University.{{fairuse}}
A little elephant is shown inside an adult elephant, an indication that the animal is pregnant. Credit: John Darnell, Yale University.{{fairuse}}

The "Atlantic period [is from] 4.6–6 ka [6,000 to 4,600 b2k]."[23]

"This newly discovered rock art site of El-Khawy preserves some of the earliest — and largest — signs from the formative stages of the hieroglyphic script [such as the back-to-back storks in the image on the right dating back around 5,200 years] and provides evidence for how the ancient Egyptians invented their unique writing system."[32]

Another "carving, [on the left, shows] a herd of elephants, created sometime between 4000 B.C. and 3500 B.C. One of the adult elephants in the scene was drawn with a little elephant inside its body [in the image on the right] — an incredibly rare way of representing a pregnant female animal."[32]

The "reign of Djoser in the Old Kingdom started between 2691 and 2625 B.C.E."[30]

"The last remains of the American ice sheet disappeared about 6000 years ago [6,000 b2k]".[7]

Beginning with the temperatures, as derivable from Greenland ice core data, it is possible to define an 'Early' or 'Pre-Atlantic' period at around 8040 BC, where the 18O isotope line remains above 33 ppm in the combined curve after Rasmussen et al. (2006),[33] which then would end at the well-known 6.2 ka BC (8.2 ka calBP)-cold-event.

"The Atlantic is equivalent to Pollen Zone VII."[34]

Boreal transition

"In some cores a narrow band of clay interrupts the organic muds, at the horizon of the Boreal Atlantic transition."[35]

Chalcolithic

The copper age history period began from 6990 b2k.

The Chalcolithic is often referred to as the Copper Age.

The "oldest securely dated evidence of copper making, from 7,000 years ago [6990 b2k], at the archaeological site of Belovode, Serbia."[36]

The "Scandinavian one 2000 years earlier [8,000 b2k]."[7]

Neolithic

The base of the Neolithic is approximated to 12,200 b2k. The transition to the Chalcolithic is between 6,500 and 4,000 b2k.

Pre-Boreal transition

The last glaciation appears to have a gradual decline ending about 12,000 b2k. This may have been the end of the Pre-Boreal transition.

"About 9000 years ago the temperature in Greenland culminated at 4°C warmer than today. Since then it has become slowly cooler with only one dramatic change of climate. This happened 8250 years ago [...]. In an otherwise warm period the temperature fell 7°C within a decade, and it took 300 years to re-establish the warm climate. This event has also been demonstrated in European wooden ring series and in European bogs."[7]

"The Pre-boreal period marks the transition from the cold climate of the Late-glacial to the warmer climate of Post-glacial time. This change is immediately obvious in the field from the nature of the sediments, changing as they do from clays to organic lake muds, showing that at this time a more or less continuous vegetation cover was developing."[35]

"At the beginning of the Pre-boreal the pollen curves of the herbaceous species have high values, and most of the genera associated with the Late-glacial fiora are still present e.g. Artemisia, Polemomium and Thalictrum. These plants become less abundant throughout the Pre-boreal, and before the beginning of the Boreal their curves have reached low values."[35]

Mesolithic

Mesolithic artefacts (most Wommersom quartzite) were found during excavation in Stevoort, 2008 (Collection Prehistoric Archeology K.U. Leuven). Credit: Vaneiles.{{free media}}
The Shigir Idol is displayed. Credit: Владислав Фальшивомонетчик.{{free media}}
Two skeletons of women aged between 25 and 35 years, dated between 6740 and 5680 BP, both of whom died a violent death. Found at Téviec, France, in 1938. Credit: Didier Descouens.{{free media}}

The mesolithic period dates from around 13,000 to 8,500 b2k.

By the time of Vere Gordon Childe's work, The Dawn of Europe (1947), which affirms the Mesolithic, sufficient data had been collected to determine that a transitional period between the Paleolithic and the Neolithic was indeed a useful concept.[37]

The Mesolithic began with the Holocene warm period around 11,660 BP and ended with the introduction of farming, the date of which varied in each geographical region. Regions that experienced greater environmental effects as the last glacial period ended have a much more apparent Mesolithic era, lasting millennia.[38]

Late Pleistocene

Late Pleistocene spans ca. 11,000-150,000 yr BP.[39]

Flandrian interglacial

The first part of the Flandrian, known as the Younger Atlantic, was a period of fairly rapid sea level rise,[40] known as the Flandrian transgression and associated with the melting of the Fenno-Scandian, Scottish, Laurentide and Cordilleran Cordilleran glaciers.

Fjords were formed during the Flandrian transgression when U-shaped glaciated valleys were inundated with water.[41]

The Flandrian began as the relatively short-lived Younger Dryas climate downturn came to an end. This formed the last gasp of the Devensian glaciation.

Younger Dryas

Percentages of Neogloboquadrina pachyderma are shown with depth and 14C dates from cores. Credit: Scott J. Lehman & Lloyd D. Keigwin.

The "Alleröd/Younger Dryas transition [occurred] some 11,000 years ago [11,000 b2k]."[42]

"The Younger Dryas interval during the Last Glacial Termination was an abrupt return to glacial-like conditions punctuating the transition to a warmer, interglacial climate."[43]

"From former cirque glaciers in western Norway, it is calculated that the summer (1.May to 30.September) temperature dropped 5-6°C during less than two centuries, probably within decades, at the Alleröd/Younger Dryas transition, some 11,000 years ago."[42]

Allerød Oscillation

The "Allerød Chronozone, 11,800 to 11,000 years ago".[42]

"During the Allerød Chronozone, 11,800 to 11,000 years ago, western Europe approached the present day environmental and climatic situation, after having suffered the last glacial maximum some 20,000 to 18,000 years ago. However, the climatic deterioration 11,000 years ago led to nearly fully glacial conditions on this continent for some few hundreds of years during the Younger Dryas. This change is completely out of phase with the Milankovitch (orbital) forcing as this is understood today, and therefore its cause is of major interest."[42]

"Excess 14C in Cariaco Basin sediments indicates a slowing in thermohaline circulation and heat transport to the North Atlantic at that time, and both marine and terrestrial paleoclimate proxy records around the North Atlantic show a short-lived (<400 yr) cold event (Intra-Allerød cold period) that began ca. 13,350 yr B.P."[44]

Pleistocene

The Pleistocene dates from 2.588 x 106 to 11,700 b2k.

People appear.

Paleolithic

Cave of Altamira and Paleolithic Cave Art of Northern Spain are shown. Credit: Yvon Fruneau, photographer.

The paleolithic period dates from around 2.6 x 106 b2k to the end of the Pleistocene around 12,000 b2k.

The Paleolithic or Palaeolithic is a period in human prehistory distinguished by the original development of stone tools that covers c. 95% of human technological prehistory.[45] It extends from the earliest known use of stone tools by hominins c. 3.3 million years ago, to the end of the Pleistocene c. 11,650 cal BP.[46]

Currently agreed upon classifications as Paleolithic geoclimatic episodes[47]
Age
(before)
North AmericaEngland (Atlantic Europe)MaghrebItalyCentral Europe
10,000 yearsFlandrian interglacialFlandrienseMellahienseVersilienseFlandrian interglacial
80,000 yearsWisconsinDevensienseRegresiónRegresiónWisconsin Stage
140,000 yearsSangamonienseIpswichienseOuljienseTirreniense II y IIIEemian Stage
200,000 yearsIllinoisWolstonienseRegresiónRegresiónWolstonian Stage
450,000 yearsYarmouthienseHoxnienseAnfatienseTirreniense IHoxnian Stage
580,000 yearsKansasAnglienseRegresiónRegresiónKansan Stage
750,000 yearsAftonienseCromerienseMaarifienseSicilienseCromerian Complex
1,100,000 yearsNebraskaBeestonienseRegresiónRegresiónBeestonian stage
1,400,000 yearsinterglaciarLudhamienseMessaudienseCalabrienseDonau-Günz

Older Dryas

Comparison of the GRIP ice core with cores from the Cariaco Basin shows the Older Dryas. Credit: Konrad A Hughes, Jonathan T. Overpeck, Larry C. Peterson & Susan Trumbore.

"Older Dryas [...] events [occurred about 13,400 b2k]".[48]

"The most negative δ 18O excursions seen in the GRIP record lasted approximately 131 and 21 years for the [inter-Allerød cold period] IACP and [Older Dryas] OD, respectively. The comparable events in the Cariaco basin were of similar duration, 127 and 21 years. In addition to the chronological agreement, there is also considerable similarity in the decade-scale patterns of variability in both records. Given the geographical distance separating central Greenland from the southern Caribbean Sea, the close match of the pattern and duration of decadal events between the two records is striking."[48]

In the figures on the right, especially b, is a detailed "comparison of δ 18O from the GRIP ice core24 with changes in a continuous sequence of light-lamina thickness measurements from core PL07-57PC. Both records are constrained by annual chronologies, although neither record is sampled at annual resolution. The interval of comparison includes the inter-Allerød cold period (12.9-13 cal. kyr BP) and Older Dryas (13.4 cal. kyr BP) events (IABP and OD from a). The durations of the two events, measured independently in both records, are very similar, as is the detailed pattern of variability at the decadal timescale."[48]

Marine Isotope Stage 1

The Earth is currently experiencing an interglacial period (warming) during the present Quaternary Ice Age, identified as the "Marine Isotope Stage 1" (MIS1) in the Holocene epoch (or recently the Anthropocene epoch).

Dansgaard–Oeschger events are considered switches between states of the climate system.[49]

The Holocene period began around 11,700 years ago and continues to the present.[50] Identified with the current warm period, known as "Marine Isotope Stage 1", or MIS 1, the Holocene is considered an interglacial period in the Quaternary glaciation or current Ice Age.

Bølling Oscillation

The Greenland ice-core oxygen isotope (δ 18O) stratigraphy. Credit: Barbara Wohlfarth.

The "intra-Bølling cold period [IBCP is a century-scale cold event and the] Bølling warming [occurs] at 14600 cal [calendar years] BP (12700 14C BP)".[51]

The "Bølling was originally defined as starting from 13000 14C BP (calibrated to ~15650 cal BP; Stuiver et al., 1998). [...] independent annual chronology indicate a much later onset of the Bølling (e.g., 14600 cal BP".[51]

"During the IBCP and perhaps also IACP, δ 18O values inversely correlate with δ 13C, but during the OD δ 18O shows positive correlation with δ 13C, suggesting dry conditions with high evaporation, as well as cold."[51]

The Bølling interstadial corresponds to GIS 1 as shown in the diagram on the right.[52]

MIS Boundary 1/2 is at 14 ka.[53]

Marine Isotope Stage 2

Termination I, also known as the Last Glacial Termination, is the end of Marine isotope stage 2.

Oldest Dryas

"During the Late Weichselian glacial maximum (20-15 ka BP) the overriding of ice streams eventually lead to strong glaciotectonic displacement of Late Pleistocene and pre-Quaternary deposits and to deposition of till."[54]

"The synchronous and nearly uniform lowering of snowlines in Southern Hemisphere middle-latitude mountains compared with Northern Hemisphere values suggests global cooling of about the same magnitude in both hemispheres at the [Last Glacial Maximum] LGM. When compared with paleoclimate records from the North Atlantic region, the middle-latitude Southern Hemisphere terrestrial data imply interhemispheric symmetry of the structure and timing of the last glacial/interglacial transition. In both regions atmospheric warming pulses are implicated near the beginning of Oldest Dryas time (~14,600 14C yr BP) and near the Oldest Dryas/Bølling transition (~12,700-13,000 14C yr BP). The second of these warming pulses was coincident with resumption of North Atlantic thermohaline circulation similar to that of the modern mode, with strong formation of Lower North Atlantic Deep Water in the Nordic Seas. In both regions, the maximum Bølling-age warmth was achieved at 12,200-12,500 14C yr BP, and was followed by a reversal in climate trend. In the North Atlantic region, and possibly in middle latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere, this reversal culminated in a Younger-Dryas-age cold pulse."[55]

Meiendorf Interstadial

Temperature curve of late glacial period, from NGRIP greenland ice core oxygen isotope ratio. Credit: Merikanto.{{free media}}

The period spans starting at the far right of the image on the right from Lascaux interstadial to Heinrich event H1, and to Meiendorf/Bölling warm stage, and Alleröd warm stage, to Younger dryas and early holocene.

The Meiendorf Interstadial is typified by a rise in the pollens of dwarf birches (Betula nana), willows (Salix sp.), sandthorns (Hippophae), junipers (Juniperus) and Artemisia.

The beginning of the Meiendorf Interstadial is around 14,700 b2k.

Heinrich event H1

This stadial starts about 17.5 ka, extends to about 15.5 ka and is followed after a brief warming by H1.

Lascaux interstadial

The Lascaux interstadial begins about 21 ka and extends to about 18 ka.

Jylland stade

"After c. 22 ka BP during the Jylland stade (Houmark-Nielsen 1989), Late Weichselian glaciers of the Main Weichselain advance overrode Southeast Denmark from the northeast and later the Young Baltic ice invaded from southeasterly directions. Traces of the Northeast-ice are apparently absent in the Klintholm sections, although large scale glaciotectonic structures and till deposits from this advance are found in Hjelm Bugt and Møns Klint (Aber 1979; Berthelsen 1981, 1986). At Klintholm, the younger phase of glaciotectonic deformation from the southeast and south and deposition of the discordant till (unit 9) were most probably associated with recessional phases of the Young Baltic glaciation. In several cliff sections, well preserved Late Glacial (c. 14-10 ka BP) lacustrine sequences are present (Kolstrup 1982, Heiberg 1991)."[54]

Laugerie Interstadial

Diagram showings the position of the Lascaux interstadial (marked in red and orange) within the time range 10 to 30 ky BP. Credit: Rudolf Pohl.{{free media}}

The weak interstadial corresponding to GIS 2 occurred about 23.2 kyr B.P.[52]

The δ18O values from GISP-2 follow the diagram of Wolfgang Weißmüller. The positions of the Dansgaard-Oeschger events DO1 to DO4 and the Heinrich events H1 to H3 are also indicated. DV 3-4 and DV 6-7 are cold events marked by ice wedges in the upper loess of Dolní Veštonice.

Letzteiszeitliches Maximum

This glacial advance begins about 26 ka and ends abruptly at about 23.4 ka.

GIS 3

The stronger GIS 3 interstadial occurred about 27.6 kyr B.P.[52]

It begins abruptly at 29 ka and ends about 26 ka.

"GIS 3 (start) 25.571 [to] GIS 3 (end) 25.337 ka BP".[56]

Stadial

Heinrich Event 3 (H3) "occurs at 26.74 ka BP, coincident with the start of the transition into GIS 4."[56]

MIS Boundary 2/3 is at 29 ka.[53]

"Stadial duration 0.768 ka".[56]

Møn interstadial

The Møn interstadial corresponds to GIS 4.[52]

Klintholm advance

This advance occurred after the Møn and ended with GIS 6.[52]

"Stadial duration 2.899 ka".[56]

GIS 5

GIS 5 interstadial occurred during the Klintholm advance about 33.5 kyr B.P.[52]

"GIS 5 (start) 30.013 [to] GIS 5 (end) 29.526 ka BP".[56]

Stadial

Stadial duration 0.836 ka""[56]

Ålesund Interstadial

The Ålesund interstadial began with GIS 6 and ended after GIS 8.[52]

"GIS 6 (start) 31.218 [to] GIS 6 (end) 30.849 ka BP".[56]

Stadial

"Stadial duration 0.932 ka".[56]

GIS 7 interstadial

"GIS 7 (start) 32.896 [to] GIS 7 (end) 32.15 ka BP".[56]

Stadial

"Stadial duration 0.642 ka".[56]

Huneborg interstadial

The Huneborg interstadial is a Greenland interstadial dating 36.5-38.5 kyr B.P. GIS 8.[52]

The Denekamp interstadial corresponds to the Huneborg interstadial.

"GIS 8 (start) 35.716 [to] GIS 8 (end) 33.977 ka BP".[56]

Heinrich Event 4

Heinrich Event 4 "33-39.93 ka BP".[56]

Hengelo interstadial

The Hengelo interstadial [is] > 35 ka BP".[54]

The "Hengelo Interstadial [is] (38–36 ka ago)."[57]

"An evolution with the coldest phases (coarsest grains) between 27,000 and 10,000 years B.P., 52,000 and 34,000 years B.P., and 76,000 and 60,000 years B.P. and relatively warmer intervals (finer grain size) in between is obvious. Apparently, they reflect a 21,000-year periodicity. This trend is superposed by much shorter oscillations of a duration of one to a few thousand years. Their duration is similar to the Dansgaard-Oeschger oscillations in the ice-core records. Some well-defined stadials and interstadials from the terrestrial records show also such a duration: for instance, the Hengelo interstadial around 37-38,500 14C years B.P. (Zagwijn, 1974; Kasse et al., 1995) and the preceding Hasselo stadial at approximately 40-38,500 14C years B.P. (Van Huissteden, 1990)."[58]

Hasselo stadial

The polarity reversal some 41,000 years ago was a global event. Credit: Norbert Nowaczyk and Helge Arz, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences.

The "Hasselo stadial [is] at approximately 40-38,500 14C years B.P. (Van Huissteden, 1990)."[58]

The "Hasselo Stadial [is a glacial advance] (44–39 ka ago)".[57]

"One of two strongly rounded fragments of the mammoth maxilla from the Shapka Quarry in the southern Leningrad region was recently dated at 38450 + 400/–300 years (GrA-39 116) and rhinoceros remains (spoke bone), back to 38360 + 300/–270 years ago (GrA-38 819) [7]. The maxilla fragments occurred in sediments of the Leningrad Interstadial, which correspond to the transition between the Hasselo Stadial (44–39 ka ago) and the Hengelo Interstadial (38–36 ka ago)."[57]

The Hasselo stadial corresponds to the Skjonghelleren stadial in Norway but to the Sejrø interstadial in Denmark.[52]

"Paleomagnetic samples were obtained from cores taken during the drilling of a research well along Coyote Creek in San Jose, California, in order to use the geomagnetic field behavior recorded in those samples to provide age constraints for the sediment encountered. The well reached a depth of 308 meters and material apparently was deposited largely (entirely?) during the Brunhes Normal Polarity Chron, which lasted from 780 ka to the present time."[59]

"Three episodes of anomalous magnetic inclinations were recorded in parts of the sedimentary sequence; the uppermost two we correlate to the Mono Lake (~30 ka) geomagnetic excursion and 6 cm lower, tentatively to the Laschamp (~45 ka) excursion."[59]

"Some 41,000 years ago, a complete and rapid reversal of the geomagnetic field occured. Magnetic studies on sediment cores from the Black Sea show that during this period, during the last ice age, a compass at the Black Sea would have pointed to the south instead of north."[60]

"[A]dditional data from other studies in the North Atlantic, the South Pacific and Hawaii, prove that this polarity reversal was a global event."[60]

"The field geometry of reversed polarity, with field lines pointing into the opposite direction when compared to today's configuration, lasted for only about 440 years, and it was associated with a field strength that was only one quarter of today's field."[60]

"The actual polarity changes lasted only 250 years. In terms of geological time scales, that is very fast."[60]

"During this period, the field was even weaker, with only 5% of today's field strength. As a consequence, Earth nearly completely lost its protection shield against hard cosmic rays, leading to a significantly increased radiation exposure."[60]

"This is documented by peaks of radioactive beryllium (10Be) in ice cores from this time, recovered from the Greenland ice sheet. 10Be as well as radioactive carbon (14C) is caused by the collision of high-energy protons from space with atoms of the atmosphere."[60]

"The polarity reversal [...] has already been known for 45 years. It was first discovered after the analysis of the magnetisation of several lava flows near the village Laschamp near Clermont-Ferrand in the Massif Central, which differed significantly from today's direction of the geomagnetic field. Since then, this geomagnetic feature is known as the 'Laschamp event'."[60]

The "new data from the Black Sea give a complete image of geomagnetic field variability at a high temporal resolution."[60]

Moershoofd interstadial

These three maps show a succession of artefacts in western and southern Europe. Credit: Catherine Brahic.

The Moershoofd interstadial has a 14C date of 44-46 kyr B.P. and corresponds to GIS 12 at 45-47 kyr B.P.[52]

Marine Isotope Stage 3

Inca Huasi was a paleolake in the Andes named by a research team in 2006.[61]

It existed about 46,000 years ago in the Salar de Uyuni basin.[61] Water levels during this episode rose by about 10 metres (33 ft). Overall, this lake cycle was short and not deep,[61] with water levels reaching a height of 3,670 metres (12,040 ft). The lake would have had a surface of 21,000 square kilometres (8,100 sq mi).[62] Most water was contributed to it by the Uyuni-Coipasa drainage basin, with only minimal contributions from Lake Titicaca.[63] Changes in the South American monsoon may have triggered its formation.[64]

Radiocarbon dates on tufa which formed in Lake Inca Huasi were dated at 45,760 ± 440 years ago.[61] Uranium-thorium dating has yielded ages between 45,760 and 47,160 years.[61] Overall the lake existed between 46,000 and 47,000 years ago.[62] The Inca Huasi cycle coincides with the marine isotope stage 3,[65] the formation of a deep lake in the Laguna Pozuelos basin and the expansion of glaciers in several parts of South America.[66]

This lake cycle took part during a glacial epoch, along with the Sajsi lake cycles.[61] A more humid climate in northeastern Argentina and elsewhere in subtropical South America has been linked to the Inca Huasi phase.[64] However, rainfall might not have increased by much on the Altiplano during the Inca Huasi cycle.[62]

Other paleolakes are Coipasa, Ouki, Minchin, Sajsi, Salinas and Tauca.[61] Research made in 2006 attributed the "Lake Minchin" to this lake phase.[64]

In archaeology, a bout-coupé is a type of handaxe that constituted part of the Neanderthal Mousterian industry of the Middle Palaeolithic. The handaxes are bifacially-worked and in the shape of a rounded triangle. They are only found in Britain in the Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS 3) interglacial between 59,000 and 41,000 years BP, and are therefore considered a unique diagnostic variant.[67][68]

Lynford Quarry is the location of a well-preserved in-situ Middle Palaeolithic open-air site near Mundford, Norfolk.[69]

The site, which dates to approximately 60,000 years ago, is believed to show evidence of hunting by Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis). The finds include the in-situ remains of at least nine woolly mammoths (Mammuthus primigenius), associated with Mousterian stone tools and debitage. The artefactual, faunal and environmental evidence were sealed within a Middle Devensian palaeochannel with a dark organic fill. Well preserved in-situ sites of the time are exceedingly rare in Europe and very unusual within a British context.[70]

The site also produced rhinoceros teeth, antlers, as well as other faunal evidence. The stone tools on the site numbered 600, made up of individual artefacts or waste flakes. Particularly interesting were the 44 hand axes of sub-triangular or ovate form.[71]

The site was dated to Marine Isotope Stage 3 using Optically Stimulated Luminescence dating of the sand from the two layers of deposits within the channel.[71]

Eruptions occurred at Monte Burney (a volcano in southern Chile, part of its Austral Volcanic Zone which consists of six volcanoes with activity during the Quaternary) during the Pleistocene. Two eruptions around 49,000 ± 500 and 48,000 ± 500 years before present deposited tephra in Laguna Potrok Aike,[72] a lake approximately 300 kilometres (190 mi) east of Monte Burney;[73] there they reach thicknesses of 48 centimetres (19 in) and 8 centimetres (3.1 in) respectively.[72] Other Pleistocene eruptions are recorded there at 26,200 and 31,000 years ago,[74] with additional eruptions having occurred during marine isotope stage 3.[74]

Glinde interstadial

The Glinde interstadial has a 14C date of 48-50 kyr B.P. and corresponds to GIS ?13/14 with a GIS age of 49-54.5 kyr B.P.[52]

Ebersdorf Stadial

This map of Australia combines genetic and archaeological data to show the movements of Aboriginal populations going back tens of thousands of years. Credit: Alan Cooper and Ray Tobler, University of Adelaide.{{fairuse}}

"Genetics suggests Neanderthal numbers dropped sharply around 50,000 years ago. This coincides with a sudden cold snap, hinting climate struck the first blow."[75]

This corresponds to the Skjonghelleren Glaciation of Scandinavia where ice crosses the North Sea between 50-40 ka BP.

"The first humans probably reached Australia around 50,000 years ago, which is the age of the oldest human skeletons and tools found."[76]

All "the Aborigines likely descend from a single population, which reached the Australian continent 50,000 years ago. Populations then spread rapidly – within 1,500 to 2,000 years – around the east and west coasts of Australia, meeting somewhere in South Australia. Over the following millennia, the population groups remained practically isolated."[76]

"Australia 50,000 years ago was part of the same landmass as New Guinea. So that the first Aborigines could have reached New Guinea by way of South East Asia and then have gone farther to Australia. There, they settled in groups over the whole continent."[76]

Many "groups of Aborigines used similar tools and shared a similar language. If humans did not move, how could tools and languages?"[77]

Oerel interstadial

The Oerel interstadial has a 14C date of 53-58 kyr B.P. and corresponds to GIS 15/16 with a GIS age of 56-59 kyr B.P.[52]

MIS Boundary 3/4 is at 57 ka.[53]

Karmøy stadial

The Karmøy stadial begins in the high mountains of Norway about 58 kyr B.P. and expands to the outer coast by 60 kyr B.P.[52]

The Schalkholz Stadial in North Germany is equivalent.

Odderade interstadial

The Odderade interstadial has a 14C date of 61-72 kyr B.P. and corresponds to GIS 21.[52]

MIS Boundary 4/5 is at 71 ka.[53]

Marine Isotope Stage 4

The glacial episode of Marine Isotope Stage 4, about 57-71,000 years ago, resulted in cooler and drier climatic conditions and the expansion of grassland vegetation. Credit: ROCEEH.{{free media}}
Neanderthal skull, Museum d'Anthropologie, campus universitaire d'Irchel, Université de Zurich (Suisse), is imaged. Credit: Guerin Nicolas.{{fairuse}}

"During the Middle Stone Age of Southern Africa, technological and behavioral innovations led to significant changes in the lifeways of modern humans. The glacial episode of Marine Isotope Stage 4, about 57-71,000 years ago, resulted in cooler and drier climatic conditions and the expansion of grassland vegetation. Sea level dropped by as much as 80 meters below its current level. During this period the cultural phase known as the Howieson’s Poort appeared across much of Southern Africa, peaking at about 60-65,000 years ago, and then disappeared. The lithic industry of the Howieson’s Poort is exemplified by changes in technology, such as the use of the punch technique, an increase in the selection of fine-grained silcrete, and the predominance of retouched pieces including backed tools, segments, scrapers and points. Segments are the type fossil of the Howieson’s Poort and represent multi-purpose armatures that were hafted onto wooden spear shafts. The standardized design and refined style of segments convey information about the behavior of their makers and provide insight about group identity. Increasing use of ochre, the presence of engraved ostrich eggshells, and a bone tool industry are associated with these stone artifacts. Also evident is an intensified use of space. Taken together, these behaviors suggest that the Howieson’s Poort represents a clear marker of modern human culture."[78]

"Using stone tool residue analysis with supporting information from zooarchaeology, we provide evidence that at the Abri du Maras, Ardèche, France, Neanderthals [a skull is imaged on the left from Abri du Maras] were behaviorally flexible at the beginning of MIS 4. Here, Neanderthals exploited a wide range of resources including large mammals, fish, ducks, raptors, rabbits, mushrooms, plants, and wood. Twisted fibers on stone tools provide evidence of making string or cordage."[79]

Wisconsinian glacial

Wisconsinian glacial began at 80,000 yr BP.[39]

Rederstall Stadial

MIS Boundary 5.3 is at 96 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 5.2 (peak) is at 87 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 5.1 (peak) is at 82 ka.[53]

Brørup interstadial

The "Brørup interstade [is about] 100 ka BP".[54] It corresponds to GIS 23/24.[52]

MIS Boundary 5.4 (peak) is at 109 ka.[53]

Herning Stadial

MIS Boundary 5.5 (peak) is at 123 ka.[53]

Eemian interglacial

The "controversially split Eemian period, the predecessor of our own warm period about 125,000 years ago."[7]

"The Eem interglaciation […] lasted from 131 to 117 kyr B.P."[7]

Late Pleistocene

Late Pleistocene spans ca. 11,000-150,000 yr BP.[39]

MIS Boundary 5/6 is at 130 ka.[53]

Sangamon Episode interglacial

"OSL dates also suggest that last interglacial (MIS 5; Sangamon Ep.) fluvial deposits are preserved locally."[80]

Age "assignment of Sangamonian (sense alto = 80,000-ca. 220,000 yr BP) [is] to Illinoian (ca. 220,000-430,000 yr BP)".[39]

MIS Boundary 6/7 is at 191 ka.[53]

Middle Pleistocene

Middle Pleistocene spans ca. 150,000-730,000 yr BP.[39]

Illinois Episode glaciation

"Ages of sediments immediately beneath the oldest till (Kellerville Mbr.) in the bedrock valley average 160 ka and provide direct confirmation that Illinois Episode (IE) glaciation began in its type area during marine isotope stage (MIS) 6. The oldest deposits found are 190 ka fluvial sands on bedrock in the deepest part of the valley. These correlate to earliest MIS 6. We now correlate the lowest deposits to the IE (Pearl Fm.)."[80]

The "last two glacial cycles [span] MIS 6 through 2".[80]

"Illinoian [is] (ca. 220,000-430,000 yr BP)".[39]

MIS Boundary 10/11 is at 374 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 9/10 is at 337 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 8/9 is at 300 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 7/8 is at 243 ka.[53]

Yarmouthian interglacial

"Clay deposition in the Piauí River floodplain around 436 ± 51.5 ka occurred during a warmer period of the [Yarmouthian interglaciation] Aftonian interglaciation, corresponding to isotope stage 12 (Ericson and Wollin, 1968)."[81]

"The extinctions and earliest known first occurrences of the 26 extant and 8 extinct cyst taxa in the three samples (with a minimum 430,000 yr BP Yarmouthian age) corroborate a likely assemblages with a maximum age of Illinoian (ca. 220,000-430,000 yr BP) in Unit I."[39]

Yarmouthian spans 420,000-500,000 yr BP.[39]

MIS Boundary 12/13 is at 478 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 11/12 is at 424 ka.[53]

Kansan glacial

Kansan glacial spans 500,000-600,000 yr BP.[39]

MIS Boundary 14/15 is at 563 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 13/14 is at 533 ka.[53]

Aftonian interglacial

Examples of pre–Illinoian stratigraphic sections are shown. Credit: M. Roy, P.U. Clark, R.W. Barendregt, J.R. Glasmann, and R.J. Enkin.{{fairuse}}

Aftonian interglacial spans ca. 600,000-650,000 yr BP.[39]

"N tills [...] show the greatest amount of feldspar and carbonate minerals in the silt fraction. This group includes at least one till unit overlain by the 0.6 Ma Lava Creek ash, thus suggesting that some of these units were deposited between 0.8 and 0.6 Ma, but also later, as indicated by two sites with a till overlying the 0.6 Ma ash (Boellstorff, 1973). The N till group is considered to include the A1, A2, and A3 tills of Boellstorff (1973, 1978b)."[82]

Lava Creek B ash is dated at 602 ka.[82]

MIS Boundary 15/16 is at 621 ka.[53]

The Yellowstone Lava Creek B ash is dated at 639 ± 2 ka ka.[83]

"The Lava Creek B ash bed (0.64 Ma) originated from one of several Yellowstone Plateau plinian eruptions that produced extensive ashfall over much of the west-central United States (Izett and Wilcox, 1982)."[83]

"The second, and geochemically analyzed, occurrence of Lava Creek B ash is in Kelso Gulch, along sloping hillsides slightly above the valley floor (Fig. 2). The tephra layer intermittently follows the contour of the hillslope at an elevation of 1,591 m. It is variably cemented with calcite and up to 5 cm thick. At this locality, geochemical confirmation of the Lava Creek B ash by co-author Wan (Table 1) comes from sample K06CO3, collected from an indurated, ca. 5-cm-thick ash bed exposed on a hillside (Fig. 2). This ash bed is thinly mantled by slope-wash."[83]

"Processing, petrographic analysis, and geochemical fingerprinting of tephra sample K06CO3 and its identification as the Lava Creek B ash was performed at the USGS Tephrochronology Laboratory and the Electron Microprobe Laboratory in Menlo Park, California."[83]

"The age of the [stag moose Cervalces] roosevelti type specimen is pre-Wisconsin (Aftonian)".[84]

"Examples of pre–Illinoian sections [are in the images on the right]. (A) Two till units with paleosols separated by nonglacial silt and clay unit at site 19 (blow-up of units to left). (B) Lava Creek B ash (0.602 Ma) cropping out near site 4. (C) Two-till unit sequence capped by loess deposits at site 15. Lower till is truncated by sand and gravel unit whereas upper till is affected by paleosol development. Sandy diamicton is present between lower till and bedrock."[82]

Nebraskan glacial

Nebraskan glacial spans ca. 650,000-1,000,000 yr BP.[39]

The magnetic field reversal to the present geomagnetic poles (Brunhes chron) occurred at 780,000 yr BP.

"The R1-till group includes two till units that overlie the 1.3 Ma Mesa Falls ash, thus indicating at least two glaciations between 1.3 Ma and 0.8 Ma."[82]

The magnetic field reversal to the opposite geomagnetic poles (subchron) occurred at 900,000 yr BP.

MIS Boundary 27/28 is at 982 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 26/27 is at 970 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 25/26 is at 959 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 24/25 is at 936 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 23/24 is at 917 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 22/23 is at 900 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 21/22 is at 866 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 20/21 is at 814 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 19/20 is at 790 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 18/19 is at 761 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 17/18 is at 712 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 16/17 is at 676 ka.[53]

Early Pleistocene

Early Pleistocene spans ca. 730,000-1,600,000 yr BP.[39]

Mesa Falls ash is dated at 1293 ka.[82]

Calabrian

Lithologic and magnetostratigraphic correlations are for the Calabrian GSSP. Credit: Maria Bianca Cita, Philip L. Gibbard, Martin J. Head, and the ICS Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy.
The Vrica section and surrounding area includes specifically the GSSP of the Calabrian Stage fixed at the top of layer ‘e’. Credit: Maria Bianca Cita, et al.

The magnetic field reversal to the present geomagnetic poles (Jaramillo subchron) occurred at 1,060,000 yr BP.

The magnetic field reversal to the opposite, back to the present, then opposite geomagnetic poles (Cobb Mountain subchron) occurred at 1,190,000 yr BP.

The magnetic field reversal to the opposite geomagnetic poles (Olduvai subchron) occurred at 1,780,000 yr BP.

"The [Calabrian] GSSP occurs at the base of the marine claystone conformably overlying sapropelic bed ‘e’ within Segment B in the Vrica section. This lithological level represents the primary marker for the recognition of the boundary, and is assigned an astronomical age of 1.80 Ma on the basis of sapropel calibration."[85]

MIS Boundary 63/64 is at 1782 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 62/63 is at 1758 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 61/62 is at 1743 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 60/61 is at 1715 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 59/60 is at 1697.5 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 58/59 is at 1670 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 57/58 is at 1642.5 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 56/57 is at 1628.5 ka.[53]

"The boundary falls between the highest occurrence of Discoaster brouweri (below) and the lowest common occurrence of left-coiling Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (above), and below the lowest occurrences of medium-sized Gephyrocapsa (including G. oceanica) and Globigerinoides tenellus."[85]

In the image on the right, the Vrica section includes specifically the GSSP of the Calabrian Stage fixed at the top of layer 'e'.

Gelasian

The base of the marly layer overlying sapropel MPRS 250, located at 62 m in the Monte San Nicola section, is the defined base of the Gelasian Stage. Credit: D. Rio, R. Sprovieri, D. Castradori, and E. Di Stefano.

Some number of N tills occurred during the Olduvai subchron.[82]

The magnetic field reversal to the present geomagnetic poles (Olduvai subchron) occurred at 2,000,000 yr BP.

The oldest till group, R2 tills, consists of till units with a reversed polarity and >77% of sedimentary clasts. Low amounts of expandable clays, substantial amounts of kaolinite, and the absence of chlorite characterize the clay mineralogy of R2 tills. The mineralogy of the silt fraction of R2 tills is rich in quartz and depleted in calcite, dolomite, and feldspar. This till group includes a till unit that underlies the 2.0-Ma Huckleberry Ridge ash, thus indicating deposition sometime between ~2.5 Ma (onset of Northern Hemisphere glaciations) (Mix et al., 1995) and 2.0 Ma.[82]

The magnetic field reversal to the present geomagnetic poles (Reunion subchron) and back occurred at 2,080,000 yr BP.

The magnetic field reversal to the present geomagnetic poles (Reunion subchron) and back occurred at 2,140,000 yr BP.

"The base of the Quaternary System [shown in the image on the right] is defined by the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Gelasian Stage at Monte San Nicola in Sicily, Italy, currently dated at 2.58 Ma."[86]

"The astrochronological age of sapropel MPRS 250 (mid-point), corresponding to precessional cycle 250 from the present, is 2.588 Ma (Lourens et al., 1996), which can be assumed as the age of the boundary."[87]

MIS Boundary 102/103 is at 2575 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 101/102 is at 2554 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 100/101 is at 2540 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 99/100 is at 2510 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 98/99 is at 2494 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 97/98 is at 2477 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 96/97 is at 2452 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 95/96 is at 2427 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 94/95 is at 2407 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 93/94 is at 2387 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 92/93 is at 2373 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 91/92 is at 2350 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 90/91 is at 2333 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 89/90 is at 2309 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 88/89 is at 2291 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 87/88 is at 2273 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 86/87 is at 2250 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 85/86 is at 2236 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 84/85 is at 2207.5 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 83/84 is at 2192 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 82/83 is at 2168 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 81/82 is at 2146 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 80/81 is at 2125 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 79/80 is at 2103 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 78/79 is at 2088 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 77/78 is at 2043 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 76/77 is at 2017 ka.[53]

Huckleberry Ridge ash is dated at 2003 ka.[82]

MIS Boundary 75/76 is at 1990 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 74/75 is at 1965 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 73/74 is at 1941 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 72/73 is at 1915 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 71/72 is at 1898 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 70/71 is at 1875 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 69/70 is at 1859.5 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 68/69 is at 1849 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 67/68 is at 1832.5 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 66/67 is at 1826 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 65/66 is at 1816 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 64/65 is at 1802.5 ka.[53]

Tertiary

The Tertiary Period extends from 65.5 ± 0.3 to 2.588 x 106 b2k.

Neogene

The Neogene dates from 23.03 x 106 to 2.58 x 106 b2k.

Pliocene

The Pliocene ranges from 5.332 x 106 to 2.588 x 106 b2k.

"All of Pliocene time, without a gap, is physically represented in the three stages of which it is composed, in a single demonstrably uninterrupted sequence of highly fossiliferous Upper Cenozoic deep-water strata on the southern coast of Sicily. From bottom to top, the Pliocene consists of the Lower Pliocene Zanclean Stage, with a boundary-stratotype at Eraclea Minoa and a unit-stratotype at Capo Rossello; the Middle Pliocene Piacenzian Stage, defined at Punta Piccola (Castradori et al., 1998); and the Upper Pliocene Gelasian Stage, defined at Monte San Nicola near Gela (Rio et al., 1994, 1998) [...]."[88]

"The base of the Quaternary System is defined by the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Gelasian Stage at Monte San Nicola in Sicily, Italy, currently dated at 2.58 Ma."[86]

Piacenzian

Chronology of the Rossello composite section is based on the correlation of small-scale carbonate cycle patterns to precession and insolation curves. Credit: D. Castradori, D. Rio, F. J. Hilgen, and L. J. Lourens.

The magnetic field reversal to the present geomagnetic poles (Matuyama chron) occurred at 2,590,000 yr BP.

MIS Boundary MG12/Gi1 is at 3592 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary MG11/MG12 is at 3578 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary MG10/MG11 is at 3566 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary MG9/MG10 is at 3546 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary MG8/MG9 is at 3532 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary MG7/MG8 is at 3517 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary MG6/MG7 is at 3471 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary MG5/MG6 is at 3444 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary MG4/MG5 is at 3387 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary MG3/MG4 is at 3372 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary MG2/MG3 is at 3347 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary MG1/MG2 is at 3332 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary M2/MG1 is at 3312 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary M1/M2 is at 3264 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary KM6/M1 is at 3238 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary KM5/KM6 is at 3212 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary KM4/KM5 is at 3184 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary KM3/KM4 is at 3167 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary KM2/KM3 is at 3150 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary KM1/KM2 is at 3119 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary K2/KM1 is at 3097 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary K1/K2 is at 3087 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G22/K1 is at 3055 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G21/G22 is at 3039 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G20/6G21 is at 3025 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G19/G20 is at 2999 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G18/G19 is at 2982.5 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G17/G18 is at 2966 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G16/G17 is at 2937 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G15/G16 is at 2913 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G14/G15 is at 2893 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G13/G14 is at 2876 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G12/G13 is at 2858 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G11/G12 is at 2838 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G10/G11 is at 2820 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G9/G10 is at 2798 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G8/G9 is at 2777 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G7/G8 is at 2759 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G6/G7 is at 2730 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G5/G6 is at 2704 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G4/G5 is at 2690 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G3/G4 is at 2681 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G2/G3 is at 2652 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary G1/G2 is at 2638 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 104/G1 is at 2614 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary 103/105 is at 2595 ka.[53]

"The base of the beige marl bed of the small-scale carbonate cycle 77 (sensu Hilgen, 1991b) is the approved base of the Piacenzian Stage (that is the Lower Pliocene-Middle Pliocene boundary). It corresponds to precessional excursion 347 as numbered from the present with an astrochronological age estimate of 3.600 Ma (Lourens et al., 1996a)."[89]

Zanclean

A view of the Eraclea Minoa section has the GSSP of the Zanclean Stage and of the Pliocene Series. Credit: John A. Van Couvering, Davide Castradori, Maria Bianca Cita, Frederik J. Hilgen, and Domenico Rio.

"The boundary-stratotype of the stage is located in the Eraclea Minoa section on the southern coast of Sicily (Italy), at the base of the Trubi Formation. The age of the Zanclean and Pliocene GSSP at the base of the stage is 5.33 Ma in the orbitally calibrated time scale, and lies within the lowermost reversed episode of the Gilbert Chron (C3n.4r), below the Thvera normal subchron."[88]

In the chronostratigraphic correlation in the Piacenzian section, the base of the Zanclean is marked as the '0' point.

MIS Boundary TG5/TG6 is at 5315 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary TG4/TG5 is at 5301 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary TG3/TG4 is at 5289 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary TG2/TG3 is at 5266 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary TG1/TG2 is at 5241 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary T8/TG1 is at 5188 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary T7/T8 is at 5165 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary T6/T7 is at 5116 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary T5/T6 is at 5094 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary T4/T5 is at 5070 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary T3/T4 is at 5038 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary T2/T3 is at 5016 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary T1/T2 is at 5002 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary ST4/T1 is at 4985 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary ST3/ST4 is at 4976 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary ST2/ST3 is at 4952.5 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary ST1/ST2 is at 4931 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Si6/ST1 is at 4904 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Si5/Si6 is at 4883 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Si4/Si5 is at 4860 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Si3/Si4 is at 4840 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Si2/Si3 is at 4821 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Si1/Si2 is at 4807 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary NS6/Si1 is at 4778 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary NS5/NS6 is at 4766 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary NS4/NS5 is at 4737 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary NS3/NS4 is at 4722.5 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary NS2/NS3 is at 4702.5 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary NS1/NS2 is at 4684 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary N10/NS1 is at 4658 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary N9/N10 is at 4648 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary N8/N9 is at 4622 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary N7/N8 is at 4603 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary N6/N7 is at 45887 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary N5/N6 is at 4570 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary N4/N5 is at 4538 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary N3/N4 is at 4523 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary N2/N3 is at 4508 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary N1/N2 is at 4487 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary CN8/N1 is at 4457 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary CN7/CN8 is at 4446 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary CN6/CN7 is at 4420 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary CN5/CN6 is at 4395 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary CN4/CN5 is at 4371 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary CN3/CN4 is at 4356 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary CN2/CN3 is at 4335 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary CN1/CN2 is at 4327 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Co4/CN1 is at 4303 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Co3/Co4 is at 4286 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Co2/Co3 is at 4259 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Co1/Co2 is at 4232 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi28/Co1 is at 4211 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi27/Gi28 is at 4192 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi26/Gi27 is at 4175 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi25/Gi26 is at 4146 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi24/Gi25 is at 4098 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi23/Gi24 is at 4085 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi22/Gi23 is at 4048 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi21/Gi22 is at 4029 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi20/Gi21 is at 4007 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi19/Gi20 is at 3978 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi18/Gi19 is at 3952 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi17/Gi18 is at 3939 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi16/Gi17 is at 3923 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi15/Gi16 is at 3912 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi14/Gi15 is at 3879 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi13/Gi14 is at 3862 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi12/Gi13 is at 3835 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi11/Gi12 is at 3822 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi10/Gi11 is at 3798 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi9/Gi10 is at 3768 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi8/Gi9 is at 3752 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi7/Gi8 is at 3742 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi6/Gi7 is at 3719 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi5/Gi6 is at 3705 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi4/Gi5 is at 3676 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi3/Gi4 is at 3660 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi2/Gi3 is at 3637 ka.[53]

MIS Boundary Gi1/Gi2 is at 3619 ka.[53]

Miocene

The Miocene dates from 23.03 x 106 to 5.332 x 106 b2k.

Messinian

Photograph of section Oued Akrech, shows sedimentary cycles OA 1–7 and the position of the Tortonian-Messinian boundary at the base of a reddish bed of cycle OA-15. Credit: F.J. Hilgen, S. Iaccarino, W. Krijgsman, G. Villa, C.G. Langereis, and W.J. Zachariasse.{{fairuse}}
Integrated magnetostratigraphy, calcareous plankton biostratigraphy and cyclostratigraphy of section Oued Akrech is diagrammed. Credit: F.J. Hilgen, S. Iaccarino, W. Krijgsman, G. Villa, C.G. Langereis, and W.J. Zachariasse.{{fairuse}}

"The GSSP of the Messinian Stage, which per definition marks the base of the Messinian and, hence, the boundary between the Tortonian and Messinian Stages of the Upper Miocene Subseries, is Oued Akrech (Morocco) where the Messinian GSSP is now formally designated at the base of the reddish layer of sedimentary cycle no. 15. This point coincides closely with the first regular occurrence (FRO) of the planktonic foraminiferal Globorotalia miotumida group and the first occurrence (FO) of the calcareous nannofossil Amaurolithus delicatus, and falls within the interval of reversed polarity that corresponds to C3Br.1r. The base of the reddish layer and, thus, the Messinian GSSP has been assigned an astronomical age of 7.251 Ma."[90]

"The correlation of characteristic sedimentary cycle patterns to the astronomical record resulted in an astronomical age of 7.24 Ma (Hilgen et al., 1995), in good agreement with the radiometric age estimates of Vai et al. (1993) and Laurenzi et al. (1997)."[90]

The integrated magnetostratigraphy, calcareous plankton biostratigraphy and cyclostratigraphy of section Oued Akrech is diagrammed on the left.

Tortonian

G. bilaspurensis jaw is displayed. Credit: Ghedoghedo.

The Tortonian lasted from 11.63 Ma to 7.246 Ma.

Gigantopithecus is an extinct genus of ape that existed from perhaps nine million years to as recently as one hundred thousand years ago, at the same period as Homo erectus would have been dispersed,[91] in what is now India, Vietnam, China and Indonesia placing Gigantopithecus in the same time frame and geographical location as several hominin species.[92][93] The primate fossil record suggests that the species Gigantopithecus blacki were the largest known primates that ever lived, standing up to 3 m (9.8 ft) and weighing as much as 540–600 kg (1,190–1,320 lb),[91][94][95][96] although some argue that it is more likely that they were much smaller, at roughly 1.8–2 m (5.9–6.6 ft) in height and 180–300 kg (400–660 lb) in weight.[97][98][99][100]

Paleogene

The Paleogene Period extends from 65.5 ± 0.3 to 23.03 ± 0.05 x 106 b2k.[101]

Oligocene

The Oligocene dates from 33.9 ± 0.1 x 106 to 23.03 x 106 b2k.

The Oligocene Epoch covers 34 - 23 Mya.

Chattian

The Chattian began 27.82 Ma and ended 23.03 Ma.[102]

During the Chattian the largest known single-event volcanic eruption occurred: the Fish Canyon Tuff (Fish Canyon eruption) of the La Garita Caldera with a magnitude of 9.2 and VEI of 8.[103] It has been dated to 27.51 Ma ago.[104]

Holarctic-Antarctic Ice Age

"This late Cenozoic ice age began at least 30 million years ago in Antarctica; it expanded to Arctic regions of southern Alaska, Greenland, Iceland, and Svalbard between 10 and 3 million years ago. Glaciers and ice sheets in these areas have been relatively stable, more-or-less permanent features during the past few million years."[105]

Rupelian

The Rupelian began 33.9 Ma and ended 27.82 Ma.[106]

Eocene

The Eocene dates from 55.8 ± 0.2 x 106 to 33.9 ± 0.1 x 106 b2k.

Priabonian

The Priabonian began 37.8 Ma and ended 33.9 Ma.[107]

Bartonian

The Bartonian began 41.2 Ma and ended 37.8 Ma.[108]

Lutetian

The Lutetian began 47.8 Ma and ended 41.2 Ma.[109]

Ypresian

The Ypresian began 56.0 Ma and ended 47.8 Ma.[110]

Paleocene

The Paleocene dates from 65.5 ± 0.3 x 106 to 55.8 ± 0.2 x 106 b2k.

Thanetian

The Thanetian began 59.2 Ma and ended 56.0 Ma.[111]

Selandian

The Selandian began 61.6 Ma and ended at 59.2 Ma.[112]

Danian

The figure shows the integrated stratigraphy across the K/Pg boundary in the El Kef section. Credit: Eustoquio Molina, Laia Alegret, Ignacio Arenillas, José A. Arz, Njoud Gallala, Jan Hardenbol, Katharina von Salis, Etienne Steurbaut, Noël Vandenberghe, and Dalila Zaghbib-Turki.
This image is a detail of the K/Pg boundary with a Tunisian coin as scale on the rusty layer. Credit: Eustoquio Molina, Laia Alegret, Ignacio Arenillas, José A. Arz, Njoud Gallala, Jan Hardenbol, Katharina von Salis, Etienne Steurbaut, Noël Vandenberghe, and Dalila Zaghbib-Turki.

"Many correlation criteria are present at the GSSP of which the most useful are the meteorite impact evidence (iridium anomaly, Ni-rich spinel, etc.) and the mass extinction of plankic micro- and nannofossils."[113]

The "GSSP of the K/Pg boundary [is defined] at the base of the boundary clay at the section near El Kef, Tunisia."[113]

"The section [specifically shown in a closeup on the right] contains marine sediments and sedimentation was as continuous as it could be at a K/Pg boundary. There is a facies change from a grey marl to a black clay (Boundary Clay), at the base of which is a thin rusty layer. This is the fingerprint of continuous sedimentation over the K/Pg boundary interval."[113]

"Neither magnetostratigraphy nor geochronometry are available at the section near El Kef."[113]

"The GSSP section near El Kef contains one main feature that allows for a direct correlation of this marine section with continental sections: the Ir anomaly at the base of the Boundary Clay."[113]

The Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point for the base of the Danian Stage is also the base GSSP for the Paleocene, Paleogene, "Tertiary", and Cenozoic at El Kef, Tunisia.

"Although crinoids appear not to have been involved in the great change in diversity at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary extinction event, it has been assumed that representatives of order Roveacrinida became extinct during this time. Well-preserved fossils from the Danian (early Paleocene) of Poland demonstrate that these crinoids survived into the earliest Cenozoic."[114]

Hoploscaphites constrictus johnjagti subsp. nov., adult macroconchs are ammonites from the Danian. Credit: Marcin Machalski.

Post-"Cretaceous ammonites of the genus Hoploscaphites have been found at Stevns Klint in Denmark (Machalski & Heinberg, 2005; Machalski et al., 2009)."[115]

"The maximum age for Danian scaphitid survivors from the Cerithium Limestone at Stevns Klint, Denmark, has recently been estimated to be around 0.2 Ma following the K–Pg boundary event (Machalski and Heinberg in press). Assuming the Cretaceous– Paleogene boundary at 65.4 ± 0.1 Ma (Jagt and Kennedy 1994), the present study covers more than 4 Ma of the final stages in scaphitid evolution."[116]

"Scaphitid material from subunit IVf−7 at the very top of the Meerssen Member [...] traditionally regarded to be uppermost Maastrichtian, has recently been reassigned to the lowermost Danian, based on microfossil and strontium isotope evidence (Smit and Brinkhuis 1996). According to Jagt et al. (2003), the scaphitid and baculitid ammonites preserved in subunit IVf−7 are early Danian survivors."[116]

Above center are Hoploscaphites constrictus johnjagti subsp. nov., adult macroconchs, ammonites from the Danian: A. MGUH 27366, lowermost Danian, Stevns Klint, Denmark, in apertural (A1), lateral (A2, A3), and ventral (A4) views.

Locations on Earth

The diagram shows a composite stratigraphic column for the stratigraphy of the lower part of the Ojo Alamo Sandstone at the San Juan River site. Credit: JE Fassett, SG Lucas, RA Zielinski, and JR Budahn.
The images show the right femur of a hadrosaurian dinosaur from the San Juan River site. Credit: JE Fassett, SG Lucas, RA Zielinski, and JR Budahn.

"A hiatus of about 8 m.y. separates Late Cretaceous from Tertiary rocks in the [San Juan] Basin. Most of the missing strata are from the Maastrichtian Stage. The unconformity is overlain by the Ojo Alamo Sandstone in the south and underlain by the Kirtland or Fruitland Formation at most other places in the basin."[117]

The right femur of the hadrosaurian dinosaur is shown at left where the bone is in place in A and after excavation, preparation, and mounting in B.

"[P]ollen was the more accurate age indicator and therefore the Ojo Alamo dinosaurs were Paleocene in age. The conclusion was tentative because Paleocene pollen nowhere occurred at exactly the same locality as dinosaur bone. Paleocene pollen is present, however, in the Ojo Alamo near Barrel Spring, within one mile of the Alamo Wash bone locality [...]."[117]

"A Cretaceous dinosaur bone collected from just below the Cretaceous-Paleogene interface yielded a U-Pb date of 73.6 ± 0.9 Ma, in excellent agreement with a previously determined 40Ar/39Ar date of 73.04 ± 0.25 Ma for an ash bed near this site. The second dinosaur bone sample from Paleocene strata just above the Cretaceous-Paleogene interface yielded a Paleocene U-Pb date of 64.8 ± 0.9 Ma, consistent with palynologic, paleomagnetic, and fossil-mammal biochronologic data."[118]

"The second bone sample BB-1, a fragment of a large sauropod femur (Alamosaurus sanjuanensis) was collected from the Paleocene Ojo Alamo Sandstone. This bone shows much less geochemical variation than bone 22799-D and is very well preserved. The weighted average 206Pb/238U date of 64.8±0.9 Ma is interpreted to record the time of bone fossilization. Considering that fossilization times are typically less than a few thousand years, the age result from BB-1 confirms the existence of Paleocene dinosaurs. The strontium isotopic composition of both bones are relatively unradiogenic (0.70811±3 and 0.70860±3, respectively). The strontium content of both bones is remarkably homogeneous, in contrast to the chemical variability displayed by most elements, therefore we interpret the strontium isotope values to reflect the indigenous bone composition."[119]

Hypotheses

  1. Each time frame or span of time in the geochronology of the Cenozoic has at least one dating technique.

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Mike Walker; Sigfus Johnsen; Sune Olander Rasmussen; Trevor Popp; Jørgen-Peder Steffensen; Phil Gibbard; Wim Hoek; John Lowe et al. (2009). "Formal definition and dating of the GSSP (Global Stratotype Section and Point) for the base of the Holocene using the Greenland NGRIP ice core, and selected auxiliary records". Journal of Quaternary Science 24 (1): 3-17. doi:10.1002/jqs.1227. http://www.stratigraphy.org/GSSP/Holocene.pdf. Retrieved 2015-01-18.
  2. Names from local versions of the geologic timescale can often be found in the local language. The English name is usually found by replacing the suffix in the local language for -an or -ian. Examples for "local" suffices are -en (French), -ano (Spanish), -ium (German), -aidd (Welsh) or -aan (Flemish Dutch). The English name "Norian", for example, becomes Noriano in Spanish, Norium in German, Noraidd in Welsh or Norien in French.
  3. 1 2 Time is given in Megaannum (million years BP, unless other units are given in the table. BP stands for "years before present". For ICS-units the absolute ages are taken from Gradstein et al. (2004).
  4. Hohenegger, Johann; Ćorić, Stjepan; Wagreich, Michael (2014). "Timing of the Middle Miocene Badenian Stage of the Central Paratethys". Geologica Carpathica 65 (1). doi:10.2478/geoca-2014-0004. http://geologie.univie.ac.at/uploads/media/Hohenegger.etal.Badenian.age.2014.GC_1_.pdf.
  5. The status of the Tertiary is not yet decided. The ICS will probably make a decision in 2009.
  6. William A. Berggren; Dennis V. Kent; John J. Flynn; John A. Van Couvering (November 1985). "Cenozoic geochronology". Geological Society of America Bulletin 96 (11): 1407-18. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1985)96<1407:CG>2.0.CO;2. http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/download/fedora_content/download/ac:143432/CONTENT/gsab.96.11.1407.full.pdf. Retrieved 2015-09-16.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Willi Dansgaard (2005). The Department of Geophysics of The Niels Bohr Institute for Astronomy Physics and Geophysics at The University of Copenhagen Denmark (ed.). Frozen Annals Greenland Ice Cap Research. Copenhagen, Denmark: Niels Bohr Institute. p. 123. ISBN 87-990078-0-0. Retrieved 2014-10-05.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Christopher T. Fisher; Helen P. Pollard; Isabel Israde-Alcántara; Victor H. Garduño-Monroy; Subir K. Banerjee (April 2003). "A reexamination of human-induced environmental change within the Lake Pátzcuaro Basin, Michoacán, Mexico". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100 (8): 4957-4962. doi:10.1073/pnas.0630493100. http://www.pnas.org/content/100/8/4957.long. Retrieved 2018-2-25.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 J.N. Lanting (2015). "DATES FOR ORIGIN AND DIFFUSION OF THE EUROPEAN LOGBOAT". Palaeohistoria 57: 627-650. http://ugp.rug.nl/Palaeohistoria/article/download/25107/22563. Retrieved 2017-10-13.
  10. 1 2 3 Mariella Moon (17 February 2018). Ancient city's LiDAR scans reveal as many buildings as Manhattan. Yahoo News. Retrieved 18 February 2018.
  11. 1 2 Chris Fisher (17 February 2018). Ancient city's LiDAR scans reveal as many buildings as Manhattan. Yahoo News. Retrieved 18 February 2018.
  12. Carl O. Sauer (July 1941). "The personality of Mexico". Geographical Review 31 (3): 353-364. doi:10.2307/210171. http://www.jstor.org/stable/210171. Retrieved 2018-2-18.
  13. 1 2 Wallace Klippert Ferguson (1962). Europe in transition, 1300-1520. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. p. 692. Retrieved 2017-10-10.
  14. P. E. Damon; D. J. Donahue; B. H. Gore; A. L. Hatheway; A. J. T. Jull; T. W. Linick; P. J. Sercel; L. J. Toolin et al. (1989). "Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin". Nature 337 (6208): 611–5. doi:10.1038/337611a0.
  15. William Meacham (June 1983). "The Authentication of the Turin Shroud: An Issue in Archaeological Epistemology". Current Anthropology 24 (3): 283-311. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2742663. Retrieved 2017-10-10.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Nicole Maca-Meyer; Matilda Arnay; Juan Carlos Rando; Carlos Flores; Ana M González; Vicente M Cabrera; José M Larruga (February 2014). "Ancient mtDNA analysis and the origin of the Guanches". European Journal of Human Genetics 12 (2): 155-62. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201075. PMID 14508507. http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v12/n2/full/5201075a.html. Retrieved 2016-01-08.
  17. Gunnar Heinsohn (8 September 2014). A Carbon-14 Chronology. Wordpress.com: Malaga Bay. Retrieved 2014-10-25.
  18. Gordon W. Pearson; Florence Qua (1993). "High-Precision 14C Measurement of Irish Oaks to Show the Natural 14C Variations from AD 1840-5000 BC: A Correction". Radiocarbon 35 (1): -24. https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/radiocarbon/article/viewFile/18069/17799#page=110. Retrieved 2014-10-25.
  19. 1 2 3 Hans-Ulrich Niemitz (3 April 2000). Did the Early Middle Ages Really Exist? (PDF). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University. Retrieved 2014-10-26.
  20. 1 2 Gunnar Heinsohn (15 March 2017). "Felix Romuliana". Q Magazine. http://www.q-mag.org/. Retrieved 2017-05-13.
  21. 1 2 A. Speranza; J. van der Plicht; B. van Geel (November 2000). "Improving the time control of the Subboreal/Subatlantic transition in a Czech peat sequence by 14C wiggle-matching". Quaternary Science Reviews 19 (16): 1589-1604. doi:10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00108-0. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/30494985_Improving_the_time_control_of_the_SubborealSubatlantic_transition_in_a_Czech_peat_sequence_by_14C_wiggle-matching/file/60b7d51c350cf2efa0.pdf. Retrieved 2014-11-04.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 Giacomo Capuzzo (2014). SPACE-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF RADIOCARBON EVIDENCE AND ASSOCIATED ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD: FROM DANUBE TO EBRO RIVERS AND FROM BRONZE TO IRON AGES (PDF). BARCELONA, Spain: UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA. p. 416. Retrieved 2017-10-11.
  23. 1 2 E.B. Karabanov; A.A. Prokopenko; D.F. Williams; G.K. Khursevich (March 2000). "A new record of Holocene climate change from the bottom sediments of Lake Baikal". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 156 (3-4): 211–24. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(99)00141-8. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018299001418. Retrieved 2014-11-04.
  24. 1 2 3 Thilo Rehrena; Tamás Belgya; Albert Jambon; György Káli; Zsolt Kasztovszky; Zoltán Kis; Imre Kovács; Boglárka Maróti et al. (December 2013). "5,000 years old Egyptian iron beads made from hammered meteoritic iron". Journal of Archaeological Science 40 (12): 4785–92. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.06.002. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440313002057. Retrieved 2016-10-23.
  25. Rehren T, et al, "5,000 years old Egyptian iron beads made from hammered meteoritic iron", Journal of Archaeological Science 2013 text
  26. Archaeomineralogy, p. 164, George Robert Rapp, Springer, 2002
  27. Understanding materials science, p. 125, Rolf E. Hummel, Springer, 2004
  28. S Bourke; U Zoppi; J Meadows; Q Hua; S Gibbins (January 2009). "The beginning of the Early Bronze Age in the north Jordan Valley: new 14C determinations from Pella in Jordan". Radiocarbon 51 (3): 905-913. doi:10.2458/azu_js_rc.51.3549. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Quan_Hua2/publication/260038389_The_Beginning_of_the_Early_Bronze_Age_in_the_North_Jordan_Valley_New_14C_determinations_from_Pella_in_Jordan/links/00b49537d32bf17b4a000000.pdf. Retrieved 2016-10-23.
  29. B.S. Ottaway (2001). "Innovation, production and specialization in early prehistoric copper metallurgy". European Journal of Archaeology 4 (1): 87-112. doi:10.1179/eja.2001.4.1.87. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/eja.2001.4.1.87. Retrieved 2016-10-23.
  30. 1 2 Christopher Bronk Ramsey; Michael W. Dee; Joanne M. Rowland; Thomas F. G. Higham; Stephen A. Harris; Fiona Brock; Anita Quiles; Eva M. Wild et al. (18 June 2010). "Radiocarbon-Based Chronology for Dynastic Egypt". Science 328 (5985): 1554-1557. doi:10.1126/science.1189395. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/328/5985/1554. Retrieved 2017-10-11.
  31. Hendrik Bruins; Johannes van der Plicht (1995). "Tell-es-Sultan (Jericho): Radiocarbon results of short-lived cereal and multiyear charcoal samples from the end of the Middle Bronze Age". Radiocarbon 37 (2): 213-220. https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/radiocarbon/article/viewFile/1666/1670. Retrieved 2017-10-11.
  32. 1 2 John Darnell (22 June 2017). 5,000-Year-Old 'Billboard' of Hieroglyphs Contains a Cosmic Message. Live Science. Retrieved 2017-06-25.
  33. S.O. Rasmussen, B.M. Vinther, H.B. Clausen, and K.K. Andersen. Greenland Ice Core Chronology 2005 (GICC05) Early Holocene section. IGBP PAGES/World Data Center for Paleoclimatology Data Contribution Series # 2006-119. NOAA/NCDC Paleoclimatology Program, Boulder CO, USA.
  34. Botteville (19 February 2006). Atlantic (period). San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 15 July 2018.
  35. 1 2 3 J. W. Franks; W. Pennington (April 1961). "The Late-Glacial and Post-Glacial Deposits of the Esthwaite Basin, North Lancashire". New Phytologist 60 (1): 27-42. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1961.tb06237.x/asset/j.1469-8137.1961.tb06237.x.pdf;jsessionid=EB6966DF0A2FBCC3534CCD6A6413808D.f02t01?v=1&t=i23es9k1&s=e619673cf5bc8be51450a303a914df03f8cba94d. Retrieved 2014-11-04.
  36. Miljana Radivojevic; Thilo Rehren (23 September 2010). Serbian site may have hosted first copper makers. London, England: UCL Institute of Archaeology. Retrieved 2015-01-18.
  37. Linder, F. (1997). Social differentiering i mesolitiska jägar-samlarsamhällen. Uppsala.: Institutionen för arkeologi och antik historia, Uppsala universitet.
  38. Conneller, Chantal; Bayliss, Alex; Milner, Nicky; Taylor, Barry (2016). "The Resettlement of the British Landscape: Towards a chronology of Early Mesolithic lithic assemblage types". Internet Archaeology 42. doi:10.11141/ia.42.12.
  39. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sam L. VanLandingham (May 2010). "Use of diatoms in determining age and paleoenvironment of the Valsequillo (Hueyatiaco) early man site, Puebla, Mexsico, with corroboration by Chrysophyta cysts for a maximum Yarmouthian (430,000-500,00yr BP) age of the artifacts". Nova Hedwigia 136: 127-38. http://www.pleistocenecoalition.com/vanlandingham/VanLandingham_2010b.pdf. Retrieved 2017-06-11.
  40. Tooley, M. J. (1979) Sea-level Changes: North-West England During the Flandrian Stage Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, ISBN 978-0-19-823228-5
  41. Stoker, Martyn S. (2010) "Late glacial ice-cap dynamics in NW Scotland: evidence from the fjords of the Summer Isles region" Quaternary Science Reviews 28(27/28): pp. 31613184, doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.09.012
  42. 1 2 3 4 Jan Mangerud (1987). W. H. Berger and L. D. Labeyrie (ed.). The Alleröd/Younger Dryas Boundary, In: Abrupt Climatic Change (PDF). D. Reidel Publishing Company. pp. 163–71. Retrieved 2014-11-03.
  43. R. Muscheler; B. Kromer; S. Björck; A. Svensson; M. Friedrich; K. F. Kaiser; J. Southon (2008). "Tree rings and ice cores reveal 14C calibration uncertainties during the Younger Dryas". Nature Geoscience 1 (4): 263-7. doi:10.1038/ngeo128. http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v1/n4/full/ngeo128.html. Retrieved 2014-10-09.
  44. Jeffrey P. Donnelly; Neal W. Driscoll; Elazar Uchupi; Lloyd D. Keigwin; William C. Schwab; E. Robert Thieler; Stephen A. Swift (February 2005). "Catastrophic meltwater discharge down the Hudson Valley: A potential trigger for the Intra-Allerød cold period". Geology 33 (2): 89-92. doi:10.1130/G21043.1. http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/content/33/2/89.abstract. Retrieved 2014-11-04.
  45. Christian, David (2014). Big History: Between Nothing and Everything. New York: McGraw Hill Education. p. 93.
  46. Toth, Nicholas; Schick, Kathy (2007). "Handbook of Paleoanthropology". Handbook of Paleoanthropology: 1943–1963. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-33761-4_64. http://www.springerlink.com/content/u68378621542472j. In Henke, H.C. Winfried; Hardt, Thorolf; Tatersall, Ian. Handbook of Paleoanthropology. Volume 3. Berlin; Heidelberg; New York: Springer-Verlag. p. 1944. (PRINT: ISBN 978-3-540-32474-4 ONLINE: ISBN 978-3-540-33761-4)
  47. Gamble, Clive (1990), El poblamiento Paleolítico de Europa, Barcelona: Editorial Crítica. ISBN 84-7423-445-X.
  48. 1 2 3 Konrad A. Hughes; Jonathan T. Overpeck; Larry C. Peterson; Susan Trumbore (7 March 1996). Rapid climate changes in the tropical Atlantic region during the last deglaciation. 380. pp. 51-4. http://www.diagonalarida.cl/SemV/Hughen_etal_1996_tropicalAtlantic.pdf. Retrieved 2014-11-05.
  49. V. N. Livina; F. Kwasniok; T. M. Lenton (2009). "Potential analysis reveals changing number of climate states during the last 60 kyr". Climate of the Past (European Geosciences Union) 5: 2223–2237. doi:10.5194/cpd-5-2223-2009. http://www.clim-past.net/6/77/2010/cp-6-77-2010.pdf.
  50. "International Stratigraphic Chart". International Commission on Stratigraphy. 2010. Retrieved 24 February 2012.
  51. 1 2 3 Zicheng Yu; Ulrich Eicher (2001). "Three Amphi-Atlantic Century-Scale Cold Events during the Bølling-Allerød Warm Period". Géographie physique et Quaternaire 55 (2): 171-9. doi:10.7202/008301ar. http://www.lehigh.edu/~ziy2/pubs/YuGpQPreprint.pdf. Retrieved 2014-11-04.
  52. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Barbara Wohlfarth (April 2010). "Ice-free conditions in Sweden during Marine Oxygen Isotope Stage 3?". Boreas 39: 377-98. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3885.2009.00137.x. http://people.su.se/~wohlf/pdf/Wohlfarth%20Boreas%202010.pdf. Retrieved 2014-11-06.
  53. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 Lisiecki, L.E., 2005, Ages of MIS boundaries. LR04 Benthic Stack Boston University, Boston, MA
  54. 1 2 3 4 Michael Houmark-Nielsen, (30 November 1994). "Late Pleistocene stratigraphy, glaciation chronology and Middle Weichselian environmental history from Klintholm, Møn, Denmark". Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 41 (2): 181-202. http://2dgf.dk/xpdf/bull41-02-181-202.pdf. Retrieved 2014-11-03.
  55. George H. Denton; Thomas V. Lowell; Calvin J. Heusser; Patricio I. Moreno; Bjørn G. Andersen; Linda E. Heusser; Christian Schlüchter; David R. Marchant (1999). "Interhemispheric Linkage of Paleoclimate during the Last Glaciation". Geografiska Annaler. Series A, Physical Geography 81A (2): 107-53. http://people.bu.edu/marchant/Dave_FullText_Papers/Denton_GA_1999.pdf. Retrieved 2014-11-05.
  56. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sasha Naomi Bharier Leigh (2007). A STUDY OF THE DYNAMICS OF THE BRITISH ICE SHEET DURING MARINE ISOTOPE STAGES 2 AND 3, FOCUSING ON HEINRICH EVENTS 2 AND 4 AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE NORTH ATLANTIC GLACIOLOGICAL AND CLIMATOLOGICAL CONDITIONS (PDF). St Andrews, Scotland: University of St Andrews. p. 219. Retrieved 2017-02-16.
  57. 1 2 3 A.A. Nikonov; M.M. Shakhnovich; J. van der Plicht (2011). "Age of Mammoth Remains from the Submoraine Sediments of the Kola Peninsula and Karelia". Doklady Earth Sciences 436 (2): 308-10. http://cio.eldoc.ub.rug.nl/FILES/root/2011/DoklEarthSciNikonov/2011DoklEarthSciNikonov.pdf?origin=publication_detail. Retrieved 2014-11-06.
  58. 1 2 J. Vandenberghe; G. Nugteren (2001). "Rapid climatic changes recorded in loess successions". Global and Planetary Change 28 (1-9): 222-30. http://shixi.bnu.edu.cn/field-trips/cooperation/ChinaSweden/the%20link/1.1.4.pdf. Retrieved 2014-11-06.
  59. 1 2 Edward A. Mankinen; Carl M. Wentworth (10 June 2003). Preliminary Paleomagnetic Results from the Coyote Creek Outdoor Classroom Drill Hole, Santa Clara Valley, California. U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  60. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Norbert R. Nowaczyk; Helge Arz (16 October 2012). Ice age polarity reversal was global event: Extremely brief reversal of geomagnetic field, climate variability, and super volcano. ScienceDaily: Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  61. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Placzek, C.; Quade, J.; Patchett, P. J. (8 May 2006). "Geochronology and stratigraphy of late Pleistocene lake cycles on the southern Bolivian Altiplano: Implications for causes of tropical climate change". Geological Society of America Bulletin 118 (5-6): 515–532. doi:10.1130/B25770.1.
  62. 1 2 3 Placzek, C.J.; Quade, J.; Patchett, P.J. (February 2013). "A 130ka reconstruction of rainfall on the Bolivian Altiplano". Earth and Planetary Science Letters 363: 97–108. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2012.12.017.
  63. Placzek, Christa J.; Quade, Jay; Patchett, P. Jonathan (January 2011). "Isotopic tracers of paleohydrologic change in large lakes of the Bolivian Altiplano". Quaternary Research 75 (1): 239. doi:10.1016/j.yqres.2010.08.004.
  64. 1 2 3 Zech, Michael; Zech, Roland; Morrás, Héctor; Moretti, Lucas; Glaser, Bruno; Zech, Wolfgang (March 2009). "Late Quaternary environmental changes in Misiones, subtropical NE Argentina, deduced from multi-proxy geochemical analyses in a palaeosol-sediment sequence". Quaternary International 196 (1-2). doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2008.06.006.
  65. Zech, Michael; Glaser, Bruno (30 January 2008). "Improved compound-specificδ13C analysis of n-alkanes for application in palaeoenvironmental studies". Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 22 (2): 136. doi:10.1002/rcm.3342.
  66. Ward, D.; Thornton, R.; Cesta, J. (15 September 2017). "Across the Arid Diagonal: deglaciation of the western Andean Cordillera in southwest Bolivia and northern Chile". Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica 43 (2): 689. doi:10.18172/cig.3209. ISSN 1697-9540. https://publicaciones.unirioja.es/ojs/index.php/cig/article/view/3209.
  67. Pettitt, Paul; White, Mark (2012). The British Palaeolithic: Human Societies at the Edge of the Pleistocene World. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. p. 349. ISBN 978-0-415-67455-3.
  68. White, Mark J; Jacobi, Roger M (May 2002). "Two Sides to Every Story: Bout Coupé Handaxes Revisited". Oxford Journal of Archaeology (Wiley Online Library) 21 (2): 109–133. doi:10.1111/1468-0092.00152. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0092.00152/abstract.
  69. Lynford Quarry, Mundford, Norfolk. English Heritage. 30 May 2003. Retrieved 17 August 2014.
  70. Donoghue, J (2006). "The Lynford mammoths: slaughtered by Neanderthals?". Current Archaeology (205): 40-44.
  71. 1 2 Boismier, B. (2002). "Lynford Quarry, A Neanderthal butchery site". Current Archaeology 16 (182): 53-58.
  72. 1 2 Kliem, P.; Buylaert, J. P.; Hahn, A.; Mayr, C.; Murray, A. S.; Ohlendorf, C.; Veres, D.; Wastegård, S. et al. (2013-07-01). "Magnitude, geomorphologic response and climate links of lake level oscillations at Laguna Potrok Aike, Patagonian steppe (Argentina)". Quaternary Science Reviews. Potrok Aike Maar Lake Sediment Archive Drilling Project (PASADO) 71: 131–146. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.08.023. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379112003411.
  73. Anselmetti, Flavio S.; Ariztegui, Daniel; De Batist, Marc; Gebhardt, Catalina A.; Haberzettl, Torsten; Niessen, Frank; Ohlendorf, Christian; Zolitschka, Bernd (2009-06-01). "Environmental history of southern Patagonia unravelled by the seismic stratigraphy of Laguna Potrok Aike". Sedimentology 56 (4). doi:10.1111/j.1365-3091.2008.01002.x/abstract. ISSN 1365-3091. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2008.01002.x/abstract.
  74. 1 2 Wastegård, S.; Veres, D.; Kliem, P.; Hahn, A.; Ohlendorf, C.; Zolitschka, B. (2013-07-01). "Towards a late Quaternary tephrochronological framework for the southernmost part of South America – the Laguna Potrok Aike tephra record". Quaternary Science Reviews. Potrok Aike Maar Lake Sediment Archive Drilling Project (PASADO) 71: 81–90. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.10.019. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379112004155.
  75. Catherine Brahic (08 August 2014). "Human exodus may have reached China 100,000 years ago". New Scientist. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22329813.000-human-exodus-may-have-reached-china-100000-years-ago.html#.U-_PEShOSlI. Retrieved 2014-08-16.
  76. 1 2 3 Alan Cooper. How the Aborigenes came to Australia. Q-Magazine. Retrieved 2017-05-29.
  77. Peter Bellwood (9 March 2017). How the Aborigenes came to Australia. Q-Magazine. Retrieved 2017-05-29.
  78. ROCEEH (1 July 2010). File:Motm 2010 07 Howiesons Poort.pdf (PDF). Wikimedia. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
  79. Bruce L. Hardy; Marie-Hélène Moncel; Camille Daujeard; Paul Fernandes; Philippe Béarez; Emmanuel Desclaux; Maria Gem; Chacon Navarro et al. (15 December 2013). "Impossible Neanderthals? Making string, throwing projectiles and catching small game during Marine Isotope Stage 4 (Abri du Maras, France)". Quaternary Science Reviews 82 (12): 23-40. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.09.028. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379113003788. Retrieved 12 July 2018.
  80. 1 2 3 E. Donald McKay III (24-25 April 2008). "Optical Ages Spanning Two Glacial-Interglacial Cycles from Deposits of the Ancient Mississippi River, North-Central Illinois". Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 40 (5): 78. https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2008NC/finalprogram/abstract_137641.htm. Retrieved 2017-06-11.
  81. Janaina C. Santos; Alcina Magnólia Franca BarretoII; Kenitiro Suguio (16 August 2012). "Quaternary deposits in the Serra da Capivara National Park and surrounding area, Southeastern Piauí state, Brazil". Geologia USP. Série Científica 12 (3). doi:10.5327/Z1519-874X2012000300008. http://ppegeo.igc.usp.br/scielo.php?pid=S1519-874X2012000300009&script=sci_arttext. Retrieved 2015-01-20.
  82. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 M. Roy; P.U. Clark; R.W. Barendregt; J.R. Glasmann; R.J. Enkin (January/February 2004). "Glacial stratigraphy and paleomagnetism of late Cenozoic deposits of the north-central United States". Geological Society of America Bulletin 116 (1/2): 30-41. doi:10.1130/B25325.1. http://geo.oregonstate.edu/files/geo/Royetal-GSAB-2004.pdf. Retrieved 2017-06-11.
  83. 1 2 3 4 Andrew L. Darling; Karl E. Karlstrom; Andres Aslan; Rex Cole; Charles Betton; Elmira Wan (May 2009). "Quaternary incision rates and drainage evolution of the Uncompahgre and Gunnison Rivers, western Colorado, as calibrated by the Lava Creek B ash". Rocky Mountain Geology 44 (1): 71–83. doi:10.1130/B25325.1. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andrew_Darling/publication/250085188_Quaternary_incision_rates_and_drainage_evolution_of_the_Uncompahgre_and_Gunnison_Rivers_western_Colorado_as_calibrated_by_the_Lava_Creek_B_ash/links/5580978b08ae607ddc3226ca.pdf. Retrieved 2017-06-11.
  84. Chris Widga; Tara L. Fulton; Larry D. Martin; Beth Shapiro (October 2012). "Homotherium serum and Cervalces from the Great Lakes Region, USA: geochronology, morphology and ancient DNA". Boreas 41 (4): 547-56. doi:1111/j.1502-3885.2012.00267.x. http://pgl.soe.ucsc.edu/widga12.pdf. Retrieved 2015-01-20.
  85. 1 2 Maria Bianca Cita; Philip L. Gibbard; Martin J. Head; the ICS Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy (September 2012). "Formal ratification of the GSSP for the base of the Calabrian Stage (second stage of the Pleistocene Series, Quaternary System)". Episodes 35 (3): 388-97. http://www.stratigraphy.org/GSSP/Calabrian2.pdf. Retrieved 2015-01-18.
  86. 1 2 Philip L. Gibbard; Martin J. Head (September 2010). "The newly-ratified definition of the Quaternary System/Period and redefinition of the Pleistocene Series/Epoch, and comparison of proposals advanced prior to formal ratification". Episodes 33 (3): 152-8. http://www.stratigraphy.org/GSSP/Quaternary&Pleistocene.pdf. Retrieved 2015-01-20.
  87. D. Rio; R. Sprovieri; D. Castradori; E. Di Stefano (June 1998). "The Gelasian Stage (Upper Pliocene): A new unit of the global standard chronostratigraphic scale". Episodes 21 (2): 82-7. http://www.stratigraphy.org/GSSP/Gelasian.pdf. Retrieved 2015-01-20.
  88. 1 2 John A. Van Couvering; Davide Castradori; Maria Bianca Cita; Frederik J. Hilgen; Domenico Rio (September 2000). [http://www.stratigraphy.org/GSSP/Zanclean.pdf "The base of the Zanclean Stage and of the Pliocene Series"]. Episodes 23 (3): 179-87. http://www.stratigraphy.org/GSSP/Zanclean.pdf. Retrieved 2015-01-23.
  89. D. Castradori; D. Rio; F. J. Hilgen; L. J. Lourens (June 1998). "The Global Standard Stratotype-section and Point (GSSP) of the Piacenzian Stage (Middle Pliocene)". Episodes 21 (2): 88-93. http://www.stratigraphy.org/GSSP/Piacenzian.pdf. Retrieved 2015-01-23.
  90. 1 2 F.J. Hilgen; S. Iaccarino; W. Krijgsman; G. Villa; C.G. Langereis (2000). "The Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Messinian Stage (uppermost Miocene)". Episodes 23 (3): 172-178. http://www.stratigraphy.org/GSSP/Messinian.pdf. Retrieved 2017-08-20.
  91. 1 2 Christmas, Jane (2005-11-07). "Giant Ape lived alongside humans". McMaster University. Archived from the original on 2012-02-06. Retrieved 2007-12-06.
  92. Ciochon, R. (1996). "Dated Co-Occurrence of Homo erectus and Gigantopithecus from Tham Khuyen Cave, Vietnam" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93 (7): 3016–3020. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.7.3016. PMID 8610161. PMC 39753. http://www.pnas.org/content/93/7/3016.full.pdf. Retrieved 2007-12-06.
  93. Sofwan, N. (2016). "Primata Besar di Jawa: Spesimen Baru Gigantopithecus dari Semedo/Giant Primate of Java: A new Gigantopithecus specimen from Semedo." (PDF). Berkala Arkeologi 36 (2): 141–160. http://berkalaarkeologi.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/berkalaarkeologi/article/download/241/246. Retrieved 2017-12-06.
  94. Ciochon, R. (1991). "The ape that was – Asian fossils reveal humanity's giant cousin". Natural History 100: 54–62. ISSN 0028-0712. Archived from the original on May 25, 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20150525202625/http://www.uiowa.edu/~bioanth/giganto.html. Retrieved 2007-12-06.
  95. Pettifor, Eric (2000) [1995]. "From the Teeth of the Dragon: Gigantopithecus blacki". Selected Readings in Physical Anthropology. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. pp. 143–149. ISBN 0-7872-7155-1. Retrieved 2008-01-30.
  96. de Vos, J., 1993. Een portret van Pleistocene zoogdieren: Op zoek naar de reuzenaap (Gigantopithecus) in Vietnam. Cranium, 10(2), pp.123-127.
  97. Relethford, J. (2003). The Human Species: An Introduction to Biological Anthropology. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-7674-3022-7.
  98. Dennel, R. (2009). The Palaeolithic Settlement of Asia. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84866-4.
  99. Singh, R. P.; Islam, Z. (2012). Environmental Studies. Concept Publishing Company Pvt. Ltd. ISBN 978-81-8069-774-6.
  100. Zhang, Y. and Harrison, T., 2017. Gigantopithecus blacki: a giant ape from the Pleistocene of Asia revisited. American journal of physical anthropology, 162(S63), pp.153-177. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23150.
  101. Robert A. Rohde (18 January 2005). Paleogene Period. GeoWhen Database. Retrieved 2015-09-16.
  102. "ICS - Chart/Time Scale". www.stratigraphy.org.
  103. Mason et al. (2004)
  104. Lanphere & Baadsgaard (2001)
  105. James S. Aber (2008). GLACIATIONS THROUGHOUT EARTH HISTORY. Emporia, Kansas USA: Emporia State University. Retrieved 2014-11-06.
  106. "ICS - Chart/Time Scale". www.stratigraphy.org.
  107. "ICS - Chart/Time Scale". www.stratigraphy.org.
  108. "ICS - Chart/Time Scale". www.stratigraphy.org.
  109. "ICS - Chart/Time Scale". www.stratigraphy.org.
  110. "ICS - Chart/Time Scale". www.stratigraphy.org.
  111. "ICS - Chart/Time Scale". www.stratigraphy.org.
  112. "ICS - Chart/Time Scale". www.stratigraphy.org.
  113. 1 2 3 4 5 Eustoquio Molina; Laia Alegret; Ignacio Arenillas; José A. Arz; Njoud Gallala; Jan Hardenbol; Katharina von Salis; Etienne Steurbaut et al. (December 2006). "The Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point for the base of the Danian Stage (Paleocene, Paleogene, "Tertiary", Cenozoic) at El Kef, Tunisia - Original definition and revision". Episodes 29 (4): 263-73. http://www.stratigraphy.org/GSSP/Danian.pdf. Retrieved 2015-01-19.
  114. Mariusz A. Salamon; Przemysław Gorzelak; Bruno Ferré; Rafał Lach (October 2010). "Roveacrinids (Crinoidea, Echinodermata) survived the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) extinction event". Geology 38 (10): 883-5. doi:10.1130/G31175.1. http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/38/10/883.short. Retrieved 2016-10-25.
  115. Dmitry A. Ruban (2009). "The survival of megafauna after the end-Pleistocene impact: a lesson from the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary". Geologos 15 (2): 129–32. https://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl/bitstream/10593/166/1/Geologos_15_2_Ruban.pdf. Retrieved 2016-10-25.
  116. 1 2 Marcin Machalski (2005). "Late Maastrichtian and earliest Danian scaphitid ammonites from central Europe: Taxonomy, evolution, and extinction". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 50 (4): 653–96. http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-article-e9991b4c-1191-4b3c-b89f-71fb4cd6cac7/c/app50-653.pdf. Retrieved 2016-10-25.
  117. 1 2 J.E. Fassett; S.G. Lucas; R.A. Zielinski; J.R. Budahn (May 2001). SG Lucas; RA Zielinski; JR Budahn (eds.). Compelling new evidence for Paleocene dinosaurs in the Ojo Alamo Sandstone, San Juan Basin, New Mexico and Colorado, USA, In: Catastrophic events and mass extinctions, Lunar and Planetary Contribution (PDF). 1053. pp. 45–6. Bibcode:2001caev.conf.3139F. Retrieved 2014-08-29.
  118. James E. Fassett; Larry M. Heaman; Antonio Simonetti (January 2011). "Direct U-Pb dating of Cretaceous and Paleocene dinosaur bones, San Juan Basin, New Mexico". Geology 39 (2): 159-62. doi:10.1130/G31466.1. http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/39/2/159.short. Retrieved 2016-10-25.
  119. Larry M. Heaman; Antonio Simonetti; James E. Fassett (11 May 2012). "IN SITU GEOCHEMICAL, SR ISOTOPIC AND U-PB DATING OF DINOSAUR BONE: A RECORD OF FOSSILIZATION AND FLUID-FLOW HISTORY IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO". Abstracts with Programs 44 (6): 86. https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2012RM/finalprogram/abstract_203306.htm. Retrieved 2016-10-25.

{{Archaeology resources}}

This article is issued from Wikiversity. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.