< Collaborative Learning
Scoring rubrics are used to communicate expectations of quality around a task and to delineate consistent criteria for grading.[1] A rubric similar to the following may be used to evaluate collaborative learning efforts:
Levels of Achievement
| Criteria | Novice | Competent | Proficient |
| Participation | 0 points Participation in team discussion board posts and wiki edits is minimal and inconsistent. | 1 point Participation in team discussion board posts and wiki edits is occasional and consistent. | 2 points Participation in team discussion board posts and wiki edits is frequent and consistent. |
| Preparation | 0 points Contributions miss team deadlines and miss assignment requirements. | 1 point Contributions meet team deadlines or are consistent with assignment requirements. | 2 points Contributions meet team deadlines and are consistent with assignment requirements. |
| Communication | 0 points Communication efforts are rarely effective or productive. | 1 point Communication efforts are usually effective and productive. | 2 points Communication efforts are consistently effective and productive. |
| Collaboration | 0 points Contributions reflect minimal and inconsistent integration with teammate efforts. | 1 point Contributions reflect occasional and consistent integration with teammate efforts. | 2 points Contributions reflect frequent and consistent integration with teammate efforts. |
| Overall Quality | 0 points Contributions reflect minimal effort or poor quality. | 1 point Contributions reflect good effort and satisfactory quality. | 2 points Contributions reflect superior effort and excellent quality. |
See Also
References
This article is issued from Wikiversity. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.