United States Supreme Court

22 U.S. 603

Wood & Brundage

March 11th.

This cause was argued by Mr. Haines, [1] in support of the rule, and by Mr. Emmett, [2] against it. March 17th.

Mr. Justice Story delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes

  1. ↑ He cited Stearns v. Barrett, 1 Mason's Rep. 153. 8 Mod. 28. 1 Salk. 144.
  2. ↑ He cited 1 U.S. Law Journal, 88. Ex parte O'Reilly, 1 Ves. jr. 112. Ex parte Fox, 1 Ves. & Beames, 67. Jefferson's Case, 2 Saund. 15.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

This article is issued from Wikisource. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.