< Page:The story of the comets.djvu
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

VI.

Periodic Comets of Short Periods.

63

sequence of this resistance? Though the catastrophe may be averted for many ages by the powerful attraction of the larger planets, especially Jupiter, will not the comet be at last precipitated on the Sun? The question is full of interest, though altogether open to conjecture."[1]

The following table, published by Encke,[2] will more clearly illustrate the changes in the comet's periodic time:—

Year of PP.Period, Days. Year of PP.Period, Days.
1786
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1825
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1211.55
(1789)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1212.79
1829
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1211.44
(1792)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1212.67
1832
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1211.32
1795
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1212.55
1835
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1211.22
(1799)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1212.44
1838
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1211.11
(1802)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1212.33
1842
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1210.98
1805
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1212.22
1845
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1210.88
(1809)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1212.10
1848
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1210.77
(1812)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1212.00
1852
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1210.65
(1815)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1211.89
1855
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1210.55
1819
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1211.78
1858
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1210.44
1822
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
1211.66

So far as it goes this table seems conclusive in its facts, but observations made at a return 10 years later than the last in the above table, namely in 1868, showed a sudden diminution in the retardation by nearly one-half the previously-noticed amount. And both the reality and also the permanence of this alteration were made clear in 1885. Some physical alteration in the comet has been suggested as the necessary explanation, but there is no visual evidence to lend colour to this idea.

The soundness of the explanation which assumes the existence of a Resisting Medium has been long and warmly canvassed, and it does not command the assent of astronomers generally. One strong point against it is that, with the exception perhaps of Winnecke's Comet (1858, ii.), none of the other short-period comets (all of them of small size and presumably slight mass) yield any indications of being subject to a like influence.[3] On the other hand Von Asten, who

  1. The Comets, p. 66.
  2. Month. Not., vol. xix, p. 70. Dec. 1858.
  3. See a notice of a paper by A. Hall in Month. Not., vol. xxxiii, p. 239. Feb. 1873.
This article is issued from Wikisource. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.