ERROR to the circuit court for the district of East Tennessee. This cause, depending mainly on the same principles with the preceding case of Preston v. Browder,a was argued by Key for the plaintiff, and by Jones for the defendant in error. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
a Ante, p. 115.
March 8th.
TODD, J., delivered the opinion of the court as follows:
Notes
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
.svg.png.webp){kind=small}
This article is issued from Wikisource. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.