OYER and TERMINER, &c.


at Philadelphia:


September Seffions, 1785.




RESPUBLICA verʃus CALDWELL


T

HIS was an indictment for a Nuiʃance, in erecting a wharf on the public property. The defendant offered witnefses to prove that the erection of the wharf has been beneficial to the public, and therefore, not to be regarded as a Nuifance.

M‘KEAN, Chieƒ Juʃtice, delivered the opinion of the Court, that the evidence was inadmiffible, for two reafons : Firʃt, Becaufe it would only amount to matter of opinion, whereas it is on facts the Court muft proceed ; and the neceffary facts are already in proof. Secondly; Becaufe it would be no juftification ; for, on the farne principle that the defendant might carry his wharf 12 feet, he could juftify extending it farther ; or any other man might excufe a fimilar intrufion. Suppofe, for inftance, a ftreet were 60 fect wide, 12 feet might be taken off it, without doing any material injury to the public property, or creating any great obftruction to paftengers ; yet, furely this will not juftify any man's actually building upon, and affuming the property of the 12 feet that could be thus fpared.

This article is issued from Wikisource. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.