RAPELIE et al. verʃus EMORY.
O
N the trial of this caufe, it was ruled by SHIPPEN, Preʃident, that were one man has received money belonging to another , an had retained it without confent of the onwer, it is to be confidered in the fame light as money lent, and ought to carry intereft. He faid that this cafe was clearly diftinguifhable from that of goods fold and delivered where no money actually paffes between the parties, and intereft is not due of courfe.
This article is issued from Wikisource. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.