no response. The commentators all make use of a verbal juggle to the effect that Jesus fulfilled the law of Moses, and that the sayings of the prophets were fulfilled in his person; that Jesus fulfilled the law as our mediator by our faith in him. And the essen tial question for every believer How to harmon ize two conflicting laws, each designed to regulate the lives of men ? is left without the slightest at tempt at explanation. Thus the contradiction be tween the verse where it is said that Jesus did not come to destroy the law, but to fulfil the law, and Jesus saying, " Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye . . . But I say unto you," the contradiction between the doctrine of Jesus and the very spirit of the Mosaic doctrine, is left without any mitigation.

Let those who are interested in the question look through the Church commentaries touching this pas sage from the time of Chrysostom to our day. After a perusal of the voluminous explanations offered, they will be convinced not only of the complete absence of any solution for the contradiction, but of the presence of a new, factitious contradiction arising in its place. Let us see what Chrysostom says in reply to those who reject the law of Moses:--

"He made this law, not that we might strike out one another's eyes, but that fear of suffering by others might restrain us from doing any such thing to them. As therefore He threatened the Ninevites with overthrow, not that He might destroy them