Ill their opinion, Jesus could not rise to the heights of wisdom and culture attained by our civilization. If he had been on an intellectual level with his mod ern critics, he never would have uttered his charm ing nonsense about the birds of the air, the turning of the other cheek, the taking no thought for the morrow. These historical critics judge of the value j of Christianity by what they see of it as it now exists. The Christianity of our age and civiliza tion approves of society as it now is, with its prison-cells, its factories, its houses of infamy, its parliaments; but as for the doctrine of Jesus, which is opposed to modern society, it is only empty words. The historical critics see this, and, unlike the so-called believers, having no motives for concealment, submit the doctrine to a careful analysis; they refute it systematically, and prove that Christianity is made up of nothing but chi merical ideas.

It would seem that before deciding upon the doc trine of Jesus, it would be necessary to understand of what it consisted; and to decide whether his doctrine is reasonable or not, it would be well first to realize that he said exactly what he did say. And this is precisely what we do not do, what the Church commentators do not do, what the free thinkers do not do and we know very well why. AVe know perfectly well that the doctrine of Jesus is directed at and denounces all human errors, all tohit, all the empty idols that we try to except from the category of errors, by dubbing them