< Page:American Historical Review vol. 6.djvu
This page needs to be proofread.

7-4 A. E. Mc Kinky

toms than anywhere else, and here, also, the English settlers, un- til Penn's day, were fewest in number. Other conditions, too, prevented the entire establishment of English laws. A town-meeting in New York City, with all its mingled races and languages, would have been an absurdity ; and this cosmopolitan character of the population required a representative or centrally administered municipal government. On the Dela- ware, where the settlers were scattered over large farms, the town- meeting and town activity were impossible. Again, policy required a toleration of all religions where no one sect was in the ascend- ancy, and Dutch practice furnished a good precedent for this. Thus, local conditions often forced the adoption of policies variant from Dutch, English or New England practices. Finally, the Dutch features which were retained for a time, or permanently, may be noted. The Dutch centrally organized pro- vincial government without popular representation was maintained for almost twenty years ; the Dutch principles of double or triple nomination and partial retirement are seen in the county and town government ; the judicial powers of the constable and overseers had a Dutch parallel ; the count)' system on the Delaware was a development from earlier Dutch customs ; some features of Dutch land-tenure persisted upon the patroon estates ; the exclusive trade- privileges of New York City and its principle of municipal freeman- ship were retained from Dutch days ; and Dutch religious tolera- tion gave a precedent for the later religious freedom, although it must not be taken as the sole cause of that liberty. Albert E. McKinley.

This article is issued from Wikisource. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.