SLAVATA

347

is

a

I

is

is,

with most of the leaders of the " Catholic reformation," as the suppression of Protestantism in Bohemia was He has also transcribed many of officially designated. the state documents which in his official capacity were accessible to him. His book is therefore valuable as a " Quellenwerk," and the historians who have in the present century rewritten the history of Bohemia have availed themselves largely of these memoirs. The whole " Catholic reformation " appears very system of the clearly in Slavata's book. It should be stated —though I run the risk of transgressing on the domain of history — that in the question which immediately caused the Bohemian movement the Protestants had the law on their side. The defenestration, in fact, only precipitated a conflict that was in any case inevitable. The only alternative would have been peaceful submission to the Church of Rome, such as Ferdinand had obtained in his hereditary lands, Styria and Carinthia, It was, of course, Slavata's task to prove that the Protestants had been the aggressors, and he devotes much ingenuity and more sophistry to that task. I have before stated that in my opinion extensive quotations are an absolute necessity when writing of a literature such as that of Bohemia, where it may be assumed as a certainty that almost all the works mentioned are entirely unknown to the reader. This however, particularly difficult in the case of Slavata, whose writings are distinctly and constantly controversial, and whose style shall, as characteristic of entirely devoid of grace. Slavata, translate portion of his account of the banquet which the officials of King Frederick gave to the Turkish ambassador on his arival at Prague. Slavata as long-winded as most of his contemporaries, and