HAJEK

309

Husinec, Master Jerome of Prague, Jacob of England, and Conrad of ' Kandelburgk ' were like one man." This account of the origin of the Hussite movement — totally incorrect, as so many of Hajek's statements — yet proves that the writer was indeed the "narrow-minded sly" boots Palack^ has called him. By greatly exaggerating the English influence on the foundation of Hussitism, and stigmatising it as a foreign movement, Hajek, as he well knew, greatly injured the Hussites ; for the intense national feeling that has always animated the Bohemians has produced among them an often exaggerated distrust of foreign interference. With all its faults, Hajek's work will always find His style, though varying according to the readers. authorities which he is using, is generally animated, a priceless merit in his pedantic age. An interest also is connected with Hajek's chronicles which the author could not have foreseen, and would not have desired. Hajek's work, sanctioned by the Roman Church, and therefore accessible to the people, continued to be read when every other book on the early history of Bohemia disappeared. It is thus to a large extent through Hajek's chronicles that the Bohemians preserved some recolA copy of Hajek's lection of their former greatness. chronicles went down from generation to generation among the Bohemian peasantry, and was cherished as an heirloom. As a lover would rather that evil be spoken of his love than that her name remain unmentioned, thus the Bohemians welcomed eagerly even hostile accounts of the deeds of Zizka, Prokop, and the other leaders under whose guidance Bohemia had once defied all Europe. Of Hajek's life little is known, and that little is by no