230

A HISTORY OF BOHEMIAN

LITERATURE

one of them, the Sumovnik (Summary), Blahoslav, who had seen the MS., writes : " As that book, the Summary, has already come into the hands of many pious and sensible people, it will, if it sees the light, cause the members of the Unity and others also to jump up from terror. The book is indeed remarkable, great, and no doubt for many of great value ; and I do not doubt that this manner of writing Bohemian and the style of writing will also please many. And some of the young, no doubt, will be found whom not only these many unheardof things, but also the new words and phrases will please, and they will with pleasure wish to use them. But as I write my judgment on this book, also 7tm ut theologus sed ut grammaticus^ that is to say, (I write) not of the contents of the book, quod non est hujus lod^ but only of the form of language de genere sermonis de verbis et phrasibus." ^ The continuation of Blahoslav's com" " is rather disappointing. It mentary on the Sumovnik consists merely of critical remarks on the diction and style of Augusta. With the exception of the remark that heretics who love impious speeches generally also write in a monstrous style, we are told nothing of the " unheard" of things contained in the book. It must, however, be remembered that Bohemian theologians of the sixteenth century — to whom every one who differed from their opinions was "Antichrist" —were very much given to expressions of horror and terror in their writings. Of Augusta's other works, his Profession of creed sent in the name of the whole Unity to his Majesty at Augsburg, his ' The

quoted in Latin are in that language in Blahoslav's BoheI shall continue quoting Blahoslav's writings as he published mian book. The constant use of Latin words them, without further mention of the fact. and phrases is a particularity of Blahoslav. passages