ACCUSATIONS AGAINST HUS

iii

It

a

it

a

a

a

is,

but their attempts to rescue him from his dungeon remained without result. It was hoped that Sigismund, who arrived at Constance on Christmas Day (1414)1 would interfere in favour of Hus, but though he at first expressed some indignation, this led to no consequences. From the beginning of January of the following year, Sigismund granted the Council full liberty of decision with regard to Hus's fate. It indeed, more than probable that during the last months of Hus's trial the king was in favour of his execution, hoping that this event would intimidate the Bohemians. The Pope had meanwhile appointed committee, consisting of three bishops, for the purpose of undertakpreliminary examination of the teaching of Hus. ing The commissioners examined numerous witnesses, all of whom were ordered to take their oaths in the presence of Hus. Thus, on one of the days when his illness was at its worst, fifteen witnesses were consecutively introduced into his prison. Hus demanded that legal adviser should be allowed him, but this was was illegal that any one refused him on the plea that should afford aid to heretic. may be noted that the condemnation of Hus had been decided on long before his three days' trial in June 1415, perhaps even, as some writers have conjectured, as early as in the previous November, when he was arrested. As soon as Hus had somewhat recovered, the act of accusation — mainly the work of Palec and Michael de Causis — was brought to his knowledge. The accusation, consisting of forty-two articles, was principally founded on statements contained in the Latin treatise De Ecclesia the last articles only dealt with statements extracted from other works of Hus. According to Mladenovic,