CHAPTER IV.
Aristotle’s ‘Rhetoric’ and ‘Art of Poetry.’
We have seen how Aristotle, when a young man, during his first residence at Athens, opened a school of Rhetoric, in rivalry to the veteran Isocrates. During his second residence, he presided over a school, not of Rhetoric alone, but of Philosophy and of all knowledge. Yet it is said that in the Peripatetic school “Rhetoric was both scientifically and assiduously taught.”[1] Rhetoric had now, however, become for Aristotle merely one in that wide range of sciences, each of which he had set himself, as far as possible, to bring to perfection. He turned to it, in due course, from his achievements in Logic, and produced his great treatise on this subject. Goethe said of his ‘Faust’ that “he had carried it for twenty years in his head, till it had become pure gold.” The first part of the ‘Rhetoric’ of Aristotle bears marks of having gone through a similar process. The outlines of its arrangement are characterised by luminous simplicity, the result of long analytic reflection; the scientific exposition is made Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/88 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/89 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/90 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/91 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/92 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/93 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/94 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/95 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/96 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/97 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/98 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/99 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/100 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/101 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/102 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/103 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/104 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/105 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/106 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/107 Page:Aristotle (Grant).djvu/108 adds a curious chapter (xxv.) on Criticisms, and how to answer them, in which the spirit of the dialectician is very apparent. All this shows that Aristotle was only gradually feeling his way to the division of sciences. He wrote, as it were, under pressure, on one great subject after another, and the light only dawned on him as he went along. Could he have rewritten his works, probably all would have been brought into lucid order. But it is clear that the little treatise called ‘Poetic’ not only was never rewritten, but was never finished as its author intended it to be.
- ↑ Professor Jebb’s ‘Attic Orators,’ ii. 431. See Diog. Laert., V. i. 3.