​

R

EPLEVIN. The material queftion, on the trial of this caufe, was, Whether the goods of a ʃtranger, being removed from the premiffes before a diftrefs, could be purfued and feized, within the thirty days, which the Act of Affembly allows for purfuing and feizing the goods of the Tenant? See 1 State Laws, 433, &c.

SHIPPEN,Preʃident, in the charge to the Jury, delivered it as the clear opinion of the Court, that the right of purfuing and feizing goods after their removal, was confined to the goods of the Leffee, from whom the rent was really due ; and that the goods of a ftranger could only be diftrained while they were on the premiffes.